Non-Uniqueness and Inadmissibility of the Vanishing Viscosity Limit of the Passive Scalar Transport Equation
Lucas Huysmans, Edriss S. Titi
TL;DR
This work shows that vanishing viscosity fails as a selection principle for the passive scalar transport equation with bounded divergence-free velocity. By constructing explicit velocity fields and carefully designed vanishing-viscosity sequences, the authors demonstrate both non-uniqueness (multiple inviscid limits from the same data) and inadmissibility (limits that violate entropy and Markovianity). The analysis hinges on renormalised weak solutions, Lagrangian flows, and a framework linking ADE and TE dynamics to control the vanishing-viscosity limit via shear-based constructions. The results imply that diffusion alone cannot guarantee physically meaningful selection of inviscid solutions and highlight the need for alternative selection criteria or regularization approaches. Overall, the paper provides deep insights into the limits of vanishing diffusion in hyperbolic transport and its implications for energy/entropy structure in passive scalar dynamics.
Abstract
We study selection by vanishing viscosity for the transport of a passive scalar $f(x,t)\in\mathbb{R}$ advected by a bounded, divergence-free vector field $u(x,t)\in\mathbb{R}^2$. This is described by the initial value problem to the PDE $\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (u f) = 0$, or with positive viscosity/diffusivity $ν>0$, to the PDE $\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (u f) -νΔf = 0$. We demonstrate the failure of the vanishing viscosity limit to select (a) unique solutions or (b) physically admissible solutions in the sense of non-increasing energy/entropy.
