A proof of the Etzion-Silberstein conjecture for monotone and MDS-constructible Ferrers diagrams
Alessandro Neri, Mima Stanojkovski
TL;DR
The paper addresses the Etzion-Silberstein conjecture on the maximal dimension of Ferrers diagram rank-metric codes, proving existence of $[\mathcal D,\nu_{\min}(\mathcal D,d),d]_{\mathbb F}$ codes for broad diagram classes. It develops a modular, algebraic construction using a cyclic extension $\mathbb L/\mathbb F$ and the skew algebra $\mathbb L[\sigma]$ to realize diagram-constrained matrix spaces inside a rank-metric framework, ensuring nonzero elements attain minimum rank $d$. The results cover $p$-monotone diagrams (and their adjoints) over fields of characteristic $p$, extend to strictly monotone and initially convex diagrams by embeddings, and finally apply diagonal/MDS-constructible arguments to obtain ES for all MDS-constructible diagrams over any finite field. Together, these findings unify and extend many prior cases, providing explicit, field-size-free MFD constructions for substantial diagram families.
Abstract
Ferrers diagram rank-metric codes were introduced by Etzion and Silberstein in 2009. In their work, they proposed a conjecture on the largest dimension of a space of matrices over a finite field whose nonzero elements are supported on a given Ferrers diagram and all have rank lower bounded by a fixed positive integer $d$. Since stated, the Etzion-Silberstein conjecture has been verified in a number of cases, often requiring additional constraints on the field size or on the minimum rank $d$ in dependence of the corresponding Ferrers diagram. As of today, this conjecture still remains widely open. Using modular methods, we give a constructive proof of the Etzion-Silberstein conjecture for the class of strictly monotone Ferrers diagrams, which does not depend on the minimum rank $d$ and holds over every finite field. In addition, we leverage on the last result to also prove the conjecture for the class of MDS-constructible Ferrers diagrams, without requiring any restriction on the field size.
