Are the Collatz and abc conjectures related?
Olivier Rozier
TL;DR
This work investigates potential connections between the Collatz and $abc$ conjectures by introducing a Lower Bound Hypothesis (LBH) for Collatz-type sequences and showing that, under the $abc$ conjecture, sharper bounds hold for sequences with mostly odd terms. A key innovation is the notion of $\mu$-hits, a subset of $abc$-hits defined via the $\mu$ function that accounts for the size of prime exponents, and their relation to Collatz dynamics. The paper demonstrates that, generically, the LBH bound improves when $abc$ holds, unless a rare $\mu$-hit is encountered, and establishes a structured link between Collatz iterations and $\mu$-hits. It also uncovers a surprising connection to Wieferich primes: certain $\mu$-hits arise from combining Wieferich primes, suggesting a path to generating large $\mu$-hits and hinting at a broader, probabilistic framework governing both conjectures. Overall, the results point to a deeper, albeit nontrivial, relationship between these central number-theoretic problems and motivate further research into the $\mu$-hit mechanism and its implications.
Abstract
The Collatz and $abc$ conjectures, both well known and thoroughly studied, appear to be largely unrelated at first sight. We show that assuming the $abc$ conjecture true is helpful to improve the lower bound of integers initiating a particular type of Collatz sequences, namely finite sequences of a given length where all terms but one are odd with the usual ``shortcut'' form. To obtain sharper bounds in this context, we are led to consider a small subset of the $abc$-hits. Then, it turns out that Collatz iterations as well as Wieferich primes may be used to find large triples in this subset.
