Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Analysis of divergence-preserving unfitted finite element methods for the mixed Poisson problem

Christoph Lehrenfeld, Tim van Beeck, Igor Voulis

Abstract

In this paper we present a new H(div)-conforming unfitted finite element method for the mixed Poisson problem which is robust in the cut configuration and preserves conservation properties of body-fitted finite element methods. The key is to formulate the divergence-constraint on the active mesh, instead of the physical domain, in order to obtain robustness with respect to cut configurations without the need for a stabilization that pollutes the mass balance. This change in the formulation results in a slight inconsistency, but does not affect the accuracy of the flux variable. By applying post-processings for the scalar variable, in virtue of classical local post-processings in body-fitted methods, we retain optimal convergence rates for both variables and even the superconvergence after post-processing of the scalar variable. We present the method and perform a rigorous a-priori error analysis of the method and discuss several variants and extensions. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results.

Analysis of divergence-preserving unfitted finite element methods for the mixed Poisson problem

Abstract

In this paper we present a new H(div)-conforming unfitted finite element method for the mixed Poisson problem which is robust in the cut configuration and preserves conservation properties of body-fitted finite element methods. The key is to formulate the divergence-constraint on the active mesh, instead of the physical domain, in order to obtain robustness with respect to cut configurations without the need for a stabilization that pollutes the mass balance. This change in the formulation results in a slight inconsistency, but does not affect the accuracy of the flux variable. By applying post-processings for the scalar variable, in virtue of classical local post-processings in body-fitted methods, we retain optimal convergence rates for both variables and even the superconvergence after post-processing of the scalar variable. We present the method and perform a rigorous a-priori error analysis of the method and discuss several variants and extensions. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results.
Paper Structure (44 sections, 15 theorems, 84 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 44 sections, 15 theorems, 84 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The method eq:new:mixedprob:a--eq:new:mixedprob:b with $f_h$ from eq:fh and $\gamma_f = \gamma_{\operatorname{div}}$ and the method eq:frachmethod from frachon2022divergence yield the same solution $u_h \in \Sigma_h$ and the same solution $p_h \in Q_h$ (and $\bar{p}_h \in Q_h$ respectively) away fro

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Example of an unfitted geometry, the active and cut part of the computational mesh (left) and a set of patches as in \ref{['ass:patches']}.
  • Figure 2: Background mesh (refinement level $0$) and cut domain for the considered geometry before (left) and after (right) parametric mesh deformation (for a mesh deformation of third order).
  • Figure 3: Numerical results for $\Vert u_h - u \Vert_{L^2}$ on $\Omega$ and $\Omega^{\mathcal{T}}$ with $\gamma_u = 0$ and $\gamma_u=1$ for polynomial degrees $k = 0,1,\dots,4$.
  • Figure 4: $L^2$-convergence of $\operatorname{div} u_h$ towards $-f$ (left) and $L^2$-error of $p_h - p$ on $\Omega$ (dashed) and $\Omega^{\text{int}}$ (solid) without post-processing (right) for polynomial degrees $k = 0,1,\dots,4$.
  • Figure 5: Post-processing results for $k=1$ (left) and $k=4$ (right).
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (40)

  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Remark 3: Patch-local integral conservation property
  • Remark 4
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Remark 5
  • Remark 6
  • ...and 30 more