Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Shor's Algorithm Does Not Factor Large Integers in the Presence of Noise

Jin-Yi Cai

TL;DR

This work analyzes Shor's quantum factoring algorithm under a model of independent random angle perturbations on controlled rotation gates and proves a provable failure regime for factoring $n$-bit numbers of the form $N=pq$ when the noise level satisfies $\epsilon > c\,n^{-1/3}$. By combining a banded variant of Shor's circuit with number-theoretic structure supplied by Fouvry's theorem, the author shows that a random element of $\mathbb{Z}_N^*$ typically has large order, enabling a lattice-based argument to bound the coherence of the noisy quantum Fourier transform. The main result asserts that, for primes from a positive-density set (and, with probability $1-o(1)$, for random primes of a given size), Shor's algorithm fails to factor $N=pq$ with exponentially small success probability when the noise is present, highlighting a fundamental sensitivity of quantum factoring to noise. The appendix extends the conclusion to random primes of length $m$ and discusses broader implications, including connections to the banded Shor approach and the discussion of the Strong Church-Turing thesis.

Abstract

We consider Shor's quantum factoring algorithm in the setting of noisy quantum gates. Under a generic model of random noise for (controlled) rotation gates, we prove that the algorithm does not factor integers of the form $pq$ when the noise exceeds a vanishingly small level in terms of $n$ -- the number of bits of the integer to be factored, where $p$ and $q$ are from a well-defined set of primes of positive density. We further prove that with probability $1 - o(1)$ over random prime pairs $(p,q)$, Shor's factoring algorithm does not factor numbers of the form $pq$, with the same level of random noise present.

Shor's Algorithm Does Not Factor Large Integers in the Presence of Noise

TL;DR

This work analyzes Shor's quantum factoring algorithm under a model of independent random angle perturbations on controlled rotation gates and proves a provable failure regime for factoring -bit numbers of the form when the noise level satisfies . By combining a banded variant of Shor's circuit with number-theoretic structure supplied by Fouvry's theorem, the author shows that a random element of typically has large order, enabling a lattice-based argument to bound the coherence of the noisy quantum Fourier transform. The main result asserts that, for primes from a positive-density set (and, with probability , for random primes of a given size), Shor's algorithm fails to factor with exponentially small success probability when the noise is present, highlighting a fundamental sensitivity of quantum factoring to noise. The appendix extends the conclusion to random primes of length and discusses broader implications, including connections to the banded Shor approach and the discussion of the Strong Church-Turing thesis.

Abstract

We consider Shor's quantum factoring algorithm in the setting of noisy quantum gates. Under a generic model of random noise for (controlled) rotation gates, we prove that the algorithm does not factor integers of the form when the noise exceeds a vanishingly small level in terms of -- the number of bits of the integer to be factored, where and are from a well-defined set of primes of positive density. We further prove that with probability over random prime pairs , Shor's factoring algorithm does not factor numbers of the form , with the same level of random noise present.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 13 theorems, 65 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 13 theorems, 65 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

There exist constants $c, c' >0$, such that if each controlled-$R_k$-gate in the quantum Fourier transform circuit is replaced by controlled-$\widetilde{R_k}$-gate for all $k \ge b$, where $b+ \log_2 \left(1/\epsilon\right) < \frac{1}{3} \log_2 n - c$, then with exponentially small exceptional proba

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4: Fouvry
  • Lemma 5
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • Lemma 7
  • Lemma 8
  • Theorem 9
  • ...and 4 more