Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families

Yang Huang, Yuejian Peng

Abstract

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-intersecting if $A\cap B\ne \emptyset$ for any $A\in \mathcal{A}$ and $B\in \mathcal{B}$. We call $t$ families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2,\dots, \mathcal{A}_t$ pairwise cross-intersecting families if $\mathcal{A}_i$ and $\mathcal{A}_j$ are cross-intersecting when $1\le i<j \le t$. Additionally, if $\mathcal{A}_j\ne \emptyset$ for each $j\in [t]$, then we say that $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2,\dots, \mathcal{A}_t$ are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let $\mathcal{A}_1\subset{[n]\choose k_1}, \mathcal{A}_2\subset{[n]\choose k_2}, \dots, \mathcal{A}_t\subset{[n]\choose k_t}$ be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with $t\geq 2$, $k_1\geq k_2\geq \cdots \geq k_t$, $n\ge k_1+k_2$ and $d_1, d_2, \dots, d_t$ be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of $\sum_{j=1}^td_j|\mathcal{A}_j|$ and characterize the families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2,\dots, \mathcal{A}_t$ attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 61 (1992)], Shi, Frankl and Qian [Combinatorica 42 (2022)], Huang and Peng \cite{huangpeng}, and Zhang-Feng \cite{ZF2023}. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some $n<k_1+k_2$ while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal-Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families $\mathcal{A}_i$ whose elements are the first $|\mathcal{A}_i|$ elements in lexicographic order. We bound $\sum_{i=1}^t{|\mathcal{A}_i|}$ by a single variable function $g(R)$, where $R$ is the last element of $\mathcal{A}_1$ in lexicographic order. One crucial and challenge part is to verify that $-g(R)$ has unimodality. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper are interesting in their own, in addition to the extremal result.

Non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families

Abstract

Two families and are cross-intersecting if for any and . We call families pairwise cross-intersecting families if and are cross-intersecting when . Additionally, if for each , then we say that are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with , , and be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of and characterize the families attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 61 (1992)], Shi, Frankl and Qian [Combinatorica 42 (2022)], Huang and Peng \cite{huangpeng}, and Zhang-Feng \cite{ZF2023}. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal-Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families whose elements are the first elements in lexicographic order. We bound by a single variable function , where is the last element of in lexicographic order. One crucial and challenge part is to verify that has unimodality. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper are interesting in their own, in addition to the extremal result.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 26 theorems, 161 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 26 theorems, 161 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $n, k$ and $t$ be positive integers with $n\geq 2k$ and $t\geq 2$. If $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2,\dots, \mathcal{A}_t\subset {[n]\choose k}$ are pairwise cross-intersecting, then and the bound is tight. If $|\mathcal{A}_1|\geq |\mathcal{A}_2|\geq \cdots \geq |\mathcal{A}_t|$, $n\ne 2k$ when $t=2$, and the equality holds, then either $\mathcal{A}_1={[n]\choose k}$, $\mathcal{A}_2=\cdots=\ma

Theorems & Definitions (81)

  • Theorem 1.1: Hilton, H
  • Theorem 1.2: Hilton--Milner, HM1967
  • Theorem 1.3: Frankl-Tokushige, FT
  • Theorem 1.4: Borg--Feghali, BF
  • Theorem 1.5: Shi--Frankl--Qian, SFQ2020
  • Theorem 1.6: Shi--Frankl--Qian, SFQ2020
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10
  • Theorem 1.11
  • ...and 71 more