Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Serre's uniformity question and proper subgroups of $C_{ns}^+(p)$

Lorenzo Furio, Davide Lombardo

TL;DR

The paper advances Serre's uniformity question over $\mathbb{Q}$ by proving that for every prime $p>5$ the mod-$p$ Galois image of any non-CM elliptic curve $E/\mathbb{Q}$ is not conjugate to the index-$3$ subgroup $G(p)$ of the normaliser of a non-split Cartan. It develops an effective surjectivity framework, refines local analyses of inertia and canonical subgroups, and conducts a detailed study of modular units on the modular curve $X_{G(p)}$ to bound $|j(E)|$ (via $|\log|q||$). A combination of explicit height comparisons, local constraints, and Abel-summation-based refinements yields $|\log|q||<39$ and an explicit prime bound $p<103{,}000$ in the remaining cases, enabling a finite computational verification that excludes the $G(p)$-image for all $p>5$. Consequently, the only possible non-surjective image for primes $p>37$ remains the normaliser of a Cartan, with the exceptional case $p=5$ already observed in prior work. Together, these results substantially advance the uniformity program by reducing the problem to a finite check and clarifying the landscape of residual images for large primes.

Abstract

Serre's uniformity question asks whether there exists a bound $N>0$ such that, for every non-CM elliptic curve $E$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ and every prime $p>N$, the residual Galois representation $ρ_{E,p}:\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q}) \to \operatorname{Aut}(E[p])$ is surjective. The work of many authors has shown that, for $p>37$, this representation is either surjective or has image contained in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup $C_{ns}^+(p)$. Zywina has further proved that, whenever $ρ_{E,p}$ is not surjective for $p>37$, its image is either $C_{ns}^+(p)$ or a certain subgroup $G(p)$ of $C_{ns}^+(p)$ of index $3$. Recently, Le Fourn and Lemos showed that the index-$3$ case cannot arise for $p>1.4 \cdot 10^7$. We strengthen this result by proving that the image of $ρ_{E, p}$ is not conjugate to $G(p)$ for any prime larger than $5$.

Serre's uniformity question and proper subgroups of $C_{ns}^+(p)$

TL;DR

The paper advances Serre's uniformity question over by proving that for every prime the mod- Galois image of any non-CM elliptic curve is not conjugate to the index- subgroup of the normaliser of a non-split Cartan. It develops an effective surjectivity framework, refines local analyses of inertia and canonical subgroups, and conducts a detailed study of modular units on the modular curve to bound (via ). A combination of explicit height comparisons, local constraints, and Abel-summation-based refinements yields and an explicit prime bound in the remaining cases, enabling a finite computational verification that excludes the -image for all . Consequently, the only possible non-surjective image for primes remains the normaliser of a Cartan, with the exceptional case already observed in prior work. Together, these results substantially advance the uniformity program by reducing the problem to a finite check and clarifying the landscape of residual images for large primes.

Abstract

Serre's uniformity question asks whether there exists a bound such that, for every non-CM elliptic curve over and every prime , the residual Galois representation is surjective. The work of many authors has shown that, for , this representation is either surjective or has image contained in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup . Zywina has further proved that, whenever is not surjective for , its image is either or a certain subgroup of of index . Recently, Le Fourn and Lemos showed that the index- case cannot arise for . We strengthen this result by proving that the image of is not conjugate to for any prime larger than .
Paper Structure (15 sections, 44 theorems, 139 equations)

This paper contains 15 sections, 44 theorems, 139 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Suppose that $\rho_{E,p}$ is not surjective for a non-CM elliptic curve $\faktor{E}{\mathbb{Q}}$ and a prime $p>37$.

Theorems & Definitions (109)

  • Theorem 1.2: Zywina
  • Theorem 1.3: Le Fourn, Lemos lefournlemos21
  • Claim 1.4: Bajolet, Bilu, Matschke
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Lemma 2.1: Bilu, Parent, Rebolledo
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • ...and 99 more