Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quadratic Lower bounds on the Approximate Stabilizer Rank: A Probabilistic Approach

Saeed Mehraban, Mehrdad Tahmasbi

TL;DR

The paper investigates the hardness of classically simulating Clifford+$T$ circuits through the lens of approximate stabilizer rank χ_δ. It develops a probabilistic, multi-step approach: (i) a strong concentration bound for χ_δ on Haar-random states, (ii) a reduction showing Haar-sampling can be achieved using T-state teleportation with m ∼ n 2^{n/2} T gates, and (iii) a stability argument that adaptive measurements do not inflate χ_δ for the targeted magic-state structure. Leveraging these steps, the authors prove a nearly quadratic lower bound χ_δ(|T>^{⊗ m}) = Ω(m^2 / polylog m) for a broad range of δ, with δ=0 extending to all Clifford-equivalent magic states. They also connect this bound to circuit complexity, conditional lower bounds on sampling hardness, and implications for the polynomial hierarchy under plausible average-case assumptions, while analyzing the behavior for t-designs. The results illuminate the non-Clifford resources necessary for stabilizer decompositions and offer a framework linking quantum circuit simulation costs to fundamental complexity-theoretic consequences. Overall, the work provides a substantial advance in understanding the limits of stabilizer-based classical simulation and the intrinsic cost of approximating magic states.

Abstract

The approximate stabilizer rank of a quantum state is the minimum number of terms in any approximate decomposition of that state into stabilizer states. Bravyi and Gosset showed that the approximate stabilizer rank of a so-called "magic" state like $|T\rangle^{\otimes n}$, up to polynomial factors, is an upper bound on the number of classical operations required to simulate an arbitrary quantum circuit with Clifford gates and $n$ number of $T$ gates. As a result, an exponential lower bound on this quantity seems inevitable. Despite this intuition, several attempts using various techniques could not lead to a better than a linear lower bound on the "exact" rank of ${|T\rangle}^{\otimes n}$, meaning the minimal size of a decomposition that exactly produces the state. For the "approximate" rank, which is more realistically related to the cost of simulating quantum circuits, no lower bound better than $\tilde Ω(\sqrt n)$ has been known. In this paper, we improve the lower bound on the approximate rank to $\tilde Ω(n^2)$ for a wide range of the approximation parameters. An immediate corollary of our result is the existence of polynomial time computable functions which require a super-linear number of terms in any decomposition into exponentials of quadratic forms over $\mathbb{F}_2$, resolving a question in [Wil18]. Our approach is based on a strong lower bound on the approximate rank of a quantum state sampled from the Haar measure, a step-by-step analysis of the approximate rank of a magic-state teleportation protocol to sample from the Haar measure, and a result about trading Clifford operations with $T$ gates by [LKS18].

Quadratic Lower bounds on the Approximate Stabilizer Rank: A Probabilistic Approach

TL;DR

The paper investigates the hardness of classically simulating Clifford+ circuits through the lens of approximate stabilizer rank χ_δ. It develops a probabilistic, multi-step approach: (i) a strong concentration bound for χ_δ on Haar-random states, (ii) a reduction showing Haar-sampling can be achieved using T-state teleportation with m ∼ n 2^{n/2} T gates, and (iii) a stability argument that adaptive measurements do not inflate χ_δ for the targeted magic-state structure. Leveraging these steps, the authors prove a nearly quadratic lower bound χ_δ(|T>^{⊗ m}) = Ω(m^2 / polylog m) for a broad range of δ, with δ=0 extending to all Clifford-equivalent magic states. They also connect this bound to circuit complexity, conditional lower bounds on sampling hardness, and implications for the polynomial hierarchy under plausible average-case assumptions, while analyzing the behavior for t-designs. The results illuminate the non-Clifford resources necessary for stabilizer decompositions and offer a framework linking quantum circuit simulation costs to fundamental complexity-theoretic consequences. Overall, the work provides a substantial advance in understanding the limits of stabilizer-based classical simulation and the intrinsic cost of approximating magic states.

Abstract

The approximate stabilizer rank of a quantum state is the minimum number of terms in any approximate decomposition of that state into stabilizer states. Bravyi and Gosset showed that the approximate stabilizer rank of a so-called "magic" state like , up to polynomial factors, is an upper bound on the number of classical operations required to simulate an arbitrary quantum circuit with Clifford gates and number of gates. As a result, an exponential lower bound on this quantity seems inevitable. Despite this intuition, several attempts using various techniques could not lead to a better than a linear lower bound on the "exact" rank of , meaning the minimal size of a decomposition that exactly produces the state. For the "approximate" rank, which is more realistically related to the cost of simulating quantum circuits, no lower bound better than has been known. In this paper, we improve the lower bound on the approximate rank to for a wide range of the approximation parameters. An immediate corollary of our result is the existence of polynomial time computable functions which require a super-linear number of terms in any decomposition into exponentials of quadratic forms over , resolving a question in [Wil18]. Our approach is based on a strong lower bound on the approximate rank of a quantum state sampled from the Haar measure, a step-by-step analysis of the approximate rank of a magic-state teleportation protocol to sample from the Haar measure, and a result about trading Clifford operations with gates by [LKS18].
Paper Structure (18 sections, 26 theorems, 69 equations, 1 figure, 1 table)

This paper contains 18 sections, 26 theorems, 69 equations, 1 figure, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $0 <\delta < 1$, then $\chi_\delta (\ket T^{\otimes m}) = \frac{\Omega(m^2)}{\textnormal{poly} \log m}$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Gadget for implementing $T$ gate

Theorems & Definitions (55)

  • Theorem 1.1: Informal statement of the main result
  • proof : Proof Sketch.
  • Theorem 1.2: Stabilizer rank and circuit complexity
  • Conjecture 1.3: Stabilizer rank and circuit complexity
  • Theorem 1.4
  • proof
  • Remark 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • proof
  • Remark 1.7
  • ...and 45 more