Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Unified Approach for Approximating 2-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph and 2-Vertex-Connected Spanning Subgraph

Ali Çivril

TL;DR

This paper presents a unified $4/3$-approximation approach for both $2$-edge-connected spanning subgraphs and $2$-vertex-connected spanning subgraphs. It starts from an inclusion-wise minimal $2$-VCSS and uses a recursive, local-improvement framework based on strong short segments, with a final cleanup for $2$-ECSS. The core contribution is a dual-cost-sharing analysis on the natural LP relaxations that proves $|F| \le \frac{4}{3}\mathrm{OPT}$, along with a reduction argument that preserves optimality bounds across transformed graphs. A tight example shows the bound is tight, and the unified method elegantly bridges the two problems with polynomial-time solvability.

Abstract

We provide algorithms for the minimum 2-edge-connected spanning subgraph problem and the minimum 2-vertex-connected spanning subgraph problem with approximation ratio both $\frac{4}{3}$. Using a common theme, the algorithms and their analyses are very similar.

A Unified Approach for Approximating 2-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph and 2-Vertex-Connected Spanning Subgraph

TL;DR

This paper presents a unified -approximation approach for both -edge-connected spanning subgraphs and -vertex-connected spanning subgraphs. It starts from an inclusion-wise minimal -VCSS and uses a recursive, local-improvement framework based on strong short segments, with a final cleanup for -ECSS. The core contribution is a dual-cost-sharing analysis on the natural LP relaxations that proves , along with a reduction argument that preserves optimality bounds across transformed graphs. A tight example shows the bound is tight, and the unified method elegantly bridges the two problems with polynomial-time solvability.

Abstract

We provide algorithms for the minimum 2-edge-connected spanning subgraph problem and the minimum 2-vertex-connected spanning subgraph problem with approximation ratio both . Using a common theme, the algorithms and their analyses are very similar.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 5 theorems, 4 equations, 15 figures, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 5 sections, 5 theorems, 4 equations, 15 figures, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Algorithm 1 runs in polynomial-time.

Figures (15)

  • Figure 1: An example of an improvement operation of size 1
  • Figure 2: An example of an improvement operation of size 1
  • Figure 3: An example of an improvement operation of size 1
  • Figure 4: An example of an improvement operation of size 1
  • Figure 5: An example of an improvement operation of size 2
  • ...and 10 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Claim 4
  • proof
  • Claim 5
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more