Phase Transitions of the Price-of-Anarchy Function in Multi-Commodity Routing Games
Roberto Cominetti, Valerio Dose, Marco Scarsini
TL;DR
This paper analyzes how Wardrop equilibria and the price of anarchy ($PoA$) in nonatomic multi-commodity routing respond to varying demands, emphasizing smoothness and phase transitions when the set of minimum-cost paths changes. It proves that, under proportional demand scaling across all OD pairs, the largest one-sided derivatives of the social cost at equilibrium and of the $PoA$ align with the smaller active regime at a breakpoint, providing a rigorous confirmation of a prior simulation-based conjecture; it also presents counterexamples showing the conjecture can fail without proportional scaling. The authors develop a robust differentiability framework using Beckmann duality and the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse to handle fixed-regime analyses and derive derivative relationships via convex quadratic programs, including a restricted linear-demand version with strict or weak inequalities depending on regime inclusions. Together, these results connect observed kinks in PoA in real networks to underlying phase transitions and clarify when one-sided derivatives can be ordered, offering guidance for traffic planning and policy design in multi-commodity contexts.
Abstract
We consider the behavior of the price of anarchy and equilibrium flows in nonatomic multi-commodity routing games as a function of the traffic demand. We analyze their smoothness with a special attention to specific values of the demand at which the support of the Wardrop equilibrium exhibits a phase transition with an abrupt change in the set of optimal routes. Typically, when such a phase transition occurs, the price of anarchy function has a breakpoint, \ie is not differentiable. We prove that, if the demand varies proportionally across all commodities, then, at a breakpoint, the largest left or right derivatives of the price of anarchy and of the social cost at equilibrium, are associated with the smaller equilibrium support. This proves -- under the assumption of proportional demand -- a conjecture of O'Hare et al. (2016), who observed this behavior in simulations. We also provide counterexamples showing that this monotonicity of the one-sided derivatives may fail when the demand does not vary proportionally, even if it moves along a straight line not passing through the origin.
