Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Spectral influence in networks: An application to Input-Output analysis

Nizar Riane

TL;DR

A new clustering algorithm is proposed that identifies communities with high cyclicality and interdependence, allowing for overlaps, and is applied to input-output analysis within the context of the Moroccan economy.

Abstract

This paper introduces the concepts of spectral influence and spectral cyclicality, both derived from the largest eigenvalue of a graph's adjacency matrix. These two novel centrality measures capture both diffusion and interdependence from a local and global perspective respectively. We propose a new clustering algorithm that identifies communities with high cyclicality and interdependence, allowing for overlaps. To illustrate our method, we apply it to input-output analysis within the context of the Moroccan economy.

Spectral influence in networks: An application to Input-Output analysis

TL;DR

A new clustering algorithm is proposed that identifies communities with high cyclicality and interdependence, allowing for overlaps, and is applied to input-output analysis within the context of the Moroccan economy.

Abstract

This paper introduces the concepts of spectral influence and spectral cyclicality, both derived from the largest eigenvalue of a graph's adjacency matrix. These two novel centrality measures capture both diffusion and interdependence from a local and global perspective respectively. We propose a new clustering algorithm that identifies communities with high cyclicality and interdependence, allowing for overlaps. To illustrate our method, we apply it to input-output analysis within the context of the Moroccan economy.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 9 theorems, 23 equations, 11 figures, 5 tables)

This paper contains 23 sections, 9 theorems, 23 equations, 11 figures, 5 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Closed walk decomposition Every closed walk can be decomposed into a union of Hamiltonian cycles.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: The whole is not the sum of the parts: for $S_1=\{1,2\}$ and $S_2=\{4,5\}$, $\sum_{s\in S_1}\left(\rho(W)- \rho(W(s))\right)=0.42 < \rho(W)-\rho(W(S_1))=1.74$ while $\sum_{s\in S_2}\left(\rho(W)- \rho(W(s))\right)=0.08 > \rho(W)-\rho(W(S_2))=0.06$.
  • Figure 2: The spectral cyclicality for different dispositions of a three vertices unweighted and connected digraph: a) perfect diffusion on a cycle, b) diffusion slowed down by a circuit, c) diffusion slowed down by a loop, d) slowest diffusion in a complete graph, e) partial diffusion, f) one way diffusion.
  • Figure 3: Evolution of Moroccan spectral cyclicality from $1995$ to $2018$.
  • Figure 4: The five divisive clusters of $2018$ Moroccan input-output table.
  • Figure 5: The six agglomerative clusters of $2018$ Moroccan input-output table.
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.1: Dominant cycle
  • Theorem 2.2: Perron-Frobenius Horn2013 ch.8
  • Corollary 2.3: Perron-Frobenius Horn2013 ch.8
  • Theorem 2.4: Horn2013 p.539
  • Definition 3.1: Spectral influence
  • Theorem 3.1: Spectral radius, closed walks and dominant cycle
  • proof
  • Remark 3.1
  • ...and 9 more