Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Foundation of classical dynamical density functional theory: uniqueness of time-dependent density-potential mappings

Michael Andreas Klatt, Christian Bair, Hartmut Löwen, René Wittmann

Abstract

When can we map a classical density profile to an external potential? In equilibrium, without time dependence, the one-body density is known to specify the external potential that is applied to the many-body system. This mapping from a density to the potential is the cornerstone of classical density functional theory (DFT). Here, we consider non-equilibrium, time-dependent many-body systems that evolve from a given initial condition. We derive explicit conditions, for example, no flux at the boundary, that ensure that the mapping from the density to a time-dependent external potential is unique. We thus prove the underlying assertion of dynamical density functional theory (DDFT), without resorting to the so-called adiabatic approximation often used in applications. By ascertaining uniqueness for all $n$-body densities, we ensure that the proof and the physical conclusions drawn from it hold for general superadiabatic dynamics of interacting systems even in the presence of (known) non-conservative forces.

Foundation of classical dynamical density functional theory: uniqueness of time-dependent density-potential mappings

Abstract

When can we map a classical density profile to an external potential? In equilibrium, without time dependence, the one-body density is known to specify the external potential that is applied to the many-body system. This mapping from a density to the potential is the cornerstone of classical density functional theory (DFT). Here, we consider non-equilibrium, time-dependent many-body systems that evolve from a given initial condition. We derive explicit conditions, for example, no flux at the boundary, that ensure that the mapping from the density to a time-dependent external potential is unique. We thus prove the underlying assertion of dynamical density functional theory (DDFT), without resorting to the so-called adiabatic approximation often used in applications. By ascertaining uniqueness for all -body densities, we ensure that the proof and the physical conclusions drawn from it hold for general superadiabatic dynamics of interacting systems even in the presence of (known) non-conservative forces.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 7 theorems, 62 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 10 sections, 7 theorems, 62 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

The reduced $n$-body density $\rho_n$ with $1\leq n < N$ obeys the following reduced Smoluchowski equation: where the last term represents a surface integral with respect to the outward unit normal vector.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Schematics of non-unique potentials for bounded domains (illustrated as within hard walls): We start from the equilibrium solution $\rho(x,t)$ for non-interacting particles (a) without an external potential, i.e., $V(x,t)=0$; or (b) with a diverging potential $V(x,t)=\tan^2(x)$. Since the systems are in equilibrium, $j(x,t)=0$. When a time-dependent potential $d_V(x,t)$ is added to the system (with $c(t)>0$), the density profile remains unchanged, $\rho'(x,t)\equiv\rho(x,t)$, but we obtain a spatially constant current $j'(x,t)\not\equiv0$, as indicated by the arrows at the bottom). Such a current requires a source and a sink at the boundary, in violation of our conditions in Theorem \ref{['thm:no-normal-flux']}.
  • Figure 2: Schematics of non-unique potentials for unbounded domains, analogous to Fig. \ref{['fig_bounded']} but now with potentials (a) $V(x,t)=x^2$ and (b) $V(x,t)=\log(1+x^2)$.

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • proof
  • Definition 4.1
  • Definition 4.2
  • Proposition 4.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.4
  • ...and 13 more