Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Towards a generic absoluteness theorem for Chang models

Sandra Müller, Grigor Sargsyan

TL;DR

The paper advances generic absoluteness for Chang-type models by representing L(Γ^∞, R) as a derived model arising from a DM-sequence built via one-step genericity constructions and stabilization under large-cardinal collapses. It extends Woodin's Sealing framework to the universally Baire setting, showing that forcing can preserve theories of key definable powersets such as L(Γ^∞, R) and L(P_{uB}(Γ^∞), R), and even L(Ord^ω, Γ^∞, R)[C^∞], under appropriate hypotheses (e.g., a supercompact κ and a class of Woodin cardinals). The paper develops the UB-Capturing Principle, the one-step construction, and a derived-model representation to prove Sealing and Generically Correct Sealing, with corollaries including Theta-regularity and robustness under forcing. These results contribute to a program aiming to render the theory of canonical determinations over Γ^∞ and related clubs and uB-structures generic-absolute, potentially reducing aspects of MM^{++} over determinacy to canonical determinacy-based inner models. Overall, the work provides a coherent framework to realize and preserve complex definable powersets through derived-model techniques in a richly large-cardinal environment, advancing our understanding of forcing-invariant theories for Γ^∞ and related objects.

Abstract

Let $Γ^\infty$ be the set of all universally Baire sets of reals. Inspired by recent work of the second author and Nam Trang, we introduce a new technique for establishing generic absoluteness results for models containing $Γ^\infty$. Our main technical tool is an iteration that realizes $Γ^\infty$ as the sets of reals in a derived model of some iterate of $V$. We show, from a supercompact cardinal $κ$ and a proper class of Woodin cardinals, that whenever $g \subseteq Col(ω, 2^{2^κ})$ is $V$-generic and $h$ is $V[g]$-generic for some poset $\mathbb{P}\in V[g]$, there is an elementary embedding $j: V\rightarrow M$ such that $j(κ)=ω_1^{V[g*h]}$ and $L(Γ^\infty, \mathbb{R})$ as computed in $V[g*h]$ is a derived model of $M$ at $j(κ)$. As a corollary we obtain that $\mathsf{Sealing}$ holds in $V[g]$, which was previously demonstrated by Woodin using the stationary tower forcing. Also, using a theorem of Woodin, we conclude that the derived model of $V$ at $κ$ satisfies $\mathsf{AD}_{\mathbb{R}}+``Θ$ is a regular cardinal". Inspired by core model induction, we introduce the definable powerset $\mathcal{A}^\infty$ of $Γ^\infty$ and use our derived model representation mentioned above to show that the theory of $L(\mathcal{A}^\infty)$ cannot be changed by forcing. Working in a different direction, we also show that the theory of $L(Γ^\infty, \mathbb{R})[\mathcal{C}]$, where $\mathcal{C}$ is the club filter on $\wp_{ω_1}(Γ^\infty)$, cannot be changed by forcing. Proving the two aforementioned results is the first step towards showing that the theory of $L(Ord^ω, Γ^\infty, \mathbb{R})([μ_α: α\in Ord])$, where $μ_α$ is the club filter on $\wp_{ω_1}(α)$, cannot be changed by forcing.

Towards a generic absoluteness theorem for Chang models

TL;DR

The paper advances generic absoluteness for Chang-type models by representing L(Γ^∞, R) as a derived model arising from a DM-sequence built via one-step genericity constructions and stabilization under large-cardinal collapses. It extends Woodin's Sealing framework to the universally Baire setting, showing that forcing can preserve theories of key definable powersets such as L(Γ^∞, R) and L(P_{uB}(Γ^∞), R), and even L(Ord^ω, Γ^∞, R)[C^∞], under appropriate hypotheses (e.g., a supercompact κ and a class of Woodin cardinals). The paper develops the UB-Capturing Principle, the one-step construction, and a derived-model representation to prove Sealing and Generically Correct Sealing, with corollaries including Theta-regularity and robustness under forcing. These results contribute to a program aiming to render the theory of canonical determinations over Γ^∞ and related clubs and uB-structures generic-absolute, potentially reducing aspects of MM^{++} over determinacy to canonical determinacy-based inner models. Overall, the work provides a coherent framework to realize and preserve complex definable powersets through derived-model techniques in a richly large-cardinal environment, advancing our understanding of forcing-invariant theories for Γ^∞ and related objects.

Abstract

Let be the set of all universally Baire sets of reals. Inspired by recent work of the second author and Nam Trang, we introduce a new technique for establishing generic absoluteness results for models containing . Our main technical tool is an iteration that realizes as the sets of reals in a derived model of some iterate of . We show, from a supercompact cardinal and a proper class of Woodin cardinals, that whenever is -generic and is -generic for some poset , there is an elementary embedding such that and as computed in is a derived model of at . As a corollary we obtain that holds in , which was previously demonstrated by Woodin using the stationary tower forcing. Also, using a theorem of Woodin, we conclude that the derived model of at satisfies is a regular cardinal". Inspired by core model induction, we introduce the definable powerset of and use our derived model representation mentioned above to show that the theory of cannot be changed by forcing. Working in a different direction, we also show that the theory of , where is the club filter on , cannot be changed by forcing. Proving the two aforementioned results is the first step towards showing that the theory of , where is the club filter on , cannot be changed by forcing.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 43 theorems, 76 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 25 sections, 43 theorems, 76 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

${\sf{MM^{++}}}$ implies Woodin's ${\sf{Axiom\ (*)}}$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of the setup in $V$.

Theorems & Definitions (123)

  • Theorem 1.1: Aspero-Schindler, AsSch21
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3: Viale, Vi16
  • Definition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5: Woodin, WoPmax
  • Theorem 1.6: Larson-Sargsyan, NairianModelsSaAnnouncement
  • Definition 1.7: Feng-Magidor-Woodin, FMW92
  • Definition 1.8: Woodin
  • Theorem 1.9: Woodin's Sealing Theorem, see La04WoodinLongExtender
  • Theorem 1.10
  • ...and 113 more