Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Do K33-Free Latin Squares Exist?

Aleksandr D. Krotov, Denis S. Krotov

TL;DR

The paper investigates the existence of $K_{3,3}$-free latin squares, framing the problem through latin square graphs, transversal trades, and eigenfunction theory. It confirms extreme rarity for small orders via exhaustive search, reproduces the known order-$8$ examples, and introduces a switched construction yielding a $K_{3,3}$-free square of order $16$ from two orthogonal $8\times8$ squares. It also extends the analysis to orthogonal latin squares, establishing the existence of both $K_{4,4}$-free and non-$K_{4,4}$-free linear pairs for every odd prime-power order larger than $5$, using algebraic (GF$(q)$) constructions and pattern-type classifications. Together, these results connect pattern-avoidance in latin square graphs with transversal trades, eigenfunction supports, and switch-based constructions, while leaving open the broader existence problem for larger orders and generalizations to larger MOLS sets.

Abstract

We discuss the problem of existence of latin squares without a substructure consisting of six elements $(r_1,c_2,l_3)$, $(r_2,c_3,l_1)$, $(r_3,c_1,l_2)$, $(r_2,c_1,l_3)$, $(r_3,c_2,l_1)$, $(r_1,c_3,l_2)$. Equivalently, the corresponding latin square graph does not have an induced subgraph isomorphic to $K_{3,3}$. The exhaustive search [Brouwer, Wanless. Universally noncommutative loops. 2011] says that there are no such latin squares of order $3$--$7$, $9$--$11$ and there are only two $K_{3,3}$-free latin squares of order $8$, up to equivalence. We repeat the search, establishing also the number of latin $m$-by-$n$ rectangles for each $m$ and $n$ less than or equal to $11$. As a switched combination of two orthogonal latin squares of order $8$, we construct a $K_{3,3}$-free (universally noncommutative) latin square of order $16$. We also consider a similar problem for orthogonal latin squares, proving that there are both $K_{4,4}$-free and non-$K_{4,4}$-free linear pairs of orthogonal latin squares for each odd prime-power order larger than~$5$. Keywords: latin square; transversal; trade; pattern avoiding; eigenfunction; universally noncommutative loop.

Do K33-Free Latin Squares Exist?

TL;DR

The paper investigates the existence of -free latin squares, framing the problem through latin square graphs, transversal trades, and eigenfunction theory. It confirms extreme rarity for small orders via exhaustive search, reproduces the known order- examples, and introduces a switched construction yielding a -free square of order from two orthogonal squares. It also extends the analysis to orthogonal latin squares, establishing the existence of both -free and non--free linear pairs for every odd prime-power order larger than , using algebraic (GF) constructions and pattern-type classifications. Together, these results connect pattern-avoidance in latin square graphs with transversal trades, eigenfunction supports, and switch-based constructions, while leaving open the broader existence problem for larger orders and generalizations to larger MOLS sets.

Abstract

We discuss the problem of existence of latin squares without a substructure consisting of six elements , , , , , . Equivalently, the corresponding latin square graph does not have an induced subgraph isomorphic to . The exhaustive search [Brouwer, Wanless. Universally noncommutative loops. 2011] says that there are no such latin squares of order --, -- and there are only two -free latin squares of order , up to equivalence. We repeat the search, establishing also the number of latin -by- rectangles for each and less than or equal to . As a switched combination of two orthogonal latin squares of order , we construct a -free (universally noncommutative) latin square of order . We also consider a similar problem for orthogonal latin squares, proving that there are both -free and non--free linear pairs of orthogonal latin squares for each odd prime-power order larger than~. Keywords: latin square; transversal; trade; pattern avoiding; eigenfunction; universally noncommutative loop.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 8 theorems, 31 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 8 sections, 8 theorems, 31 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Six distinct elements $x$, $x'$, $x"$, $y$, $y'$, $y"$ of a latin rectangle $S$ induce a complete bipartite subgraph of $\Gamma(S)$ with parts $\{x, x', x"\}$ and $\{y, y', y"\}$ if and only if $x=(r_1,c_2,l_3)$, $x'=(r_2,c_3,l_1)$, $x"=(r_3,c_1,l_2)$, and for some $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $c_1$, $c_2$, $c_3$, $l_1$, $l_2$, $l_3$.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: The two $K_{3,3}$-free $8\times 8$ latin squares and related orthogonal $4\times 4$ latin squares
  • Figure 2: The $K_{3,3}$-free latin rectangles $4\times 5$ and $8\times 9$, with their continuations to latin squares.
  • Figure 3: Two $K_{3,3}$-free latin $11\times 12$ rectangles and one $K_{3,3}$-free latin $9\times 12$ rectangles without intercalates.
  • Figure 4: The two $K_{3,3}$-free $8\times 8$ latin squares and related orthogonal $4\times 4$ latin squares
  • Figure 5: Two orthogonal latin squares and a switching function that give a $K_{3,3}$-free latin square of order $16$ as a switched combitation
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • ...and 3 more