Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Universal dual-port grid-forming control: bridging the gap between grid-forming and grid-following control

Irina Subotić, and Dominic Groß

TL;DR

This work addresses stability challenges in hybrid ac/dc power systems with converter-interfaced renewables, storage, HVDC, and legacy generators. It introduces universal dual-port GFM control based on a PD $v_{\text{dc}}-f$ droop, implemented in a derivative-free PI form to unify grid-forming and grid-following functions without mode switching. The paper provides an end-to-end linearized model, concise stability conditions for VSC gains and ac-topologies, and a steady-state analysis that yields quasi-synchronous behavior under typical HVDC conditions, along with case studies on a IEEE 9-bus-inspired network and a large-scale system. Through simulations, it demonstrates grid-support from curtailed renewables, approximate MPP tracking, and robust performance under severe contingencies, highlighting reduced complexity and improved interoperability across diverse technologies.

Abstract

We analyze a dual-port grid-forming (GFM) control for power systems containing ac and dc transmission, converter-interfaced generation and energy storage, and legacy generation. To operate such a system and provide standard services, state-of-the-art control architectures i) require assigning grid-following (GFL) and GFM controls to different converters, and ii) result in highly complex system dynamics. In contrast, dual-port GFM control (i) subsumes common functions of GFM and GFL controls in a simple controller, ii) can be applied to a wide range of emerging technologies independently of the network configuration, and iii) significantly reduces system complexity. In this work, we provide i) an end-to-end modeling framework that allows to model complex topologies through composition of reduced-order device models, ii) an in-depth discussion of universal dual-port GFM control for emerging power systems, and iii) end-to-end stability conditions that cover a wide range of network topologies, emerging technologies, and legacy technologies. Finally, we validate our findings in detailed case studies.

Universal dual-port grid-forming control: bridging the gap between grid-forming and grid-following control

TL;DR

This work addresses stability challenges in hybrid ac/dc power systems with converter-interfaced renewables, storage, HVDC, and legacy generators. It introduces universal dual-port GFM control based on a PD droop, implemented in a derivative-free PI form to unify grid-forming and grid-following functions without mode switching. The paper provides an end-to-end linearized model, concise stability conditions for VSC gains and ac-topologies, and a steady-state analysis that yields quasi-synchronous behavior under typical HVDC conditions, along with case studies on a IEEE 9-bus-inspired network and a large-scale system. Through simulations, it demonstrates grid-support from curtailed renewables, approximate MPP tracking, and robust performance under severe contingencies, highlighting reduced complexity and improved interoperability across diverse technologies.

Abstract

We analyze a dual-port grid-forming (GFM) control for power systems containing ac and dc transmission, converter-interfaced generation and energy storage, and legacy generation. To operate such a system and provide standard services, state-of-the-art control architectures i) require assigning grid-following (GFL) and GFM controls to different converters, and ii) result in highly complex system dynamics. In contrast, dual-port GFM control (i) subsumes common functions of GFM and GFL controls in a simple controller, ii) can be applied to a wide range of emerging technologies independently of the network configuration, and iii) significantly reduces system complexity. In this work, we provide i) an end-to-end modeling framework that allows to model complex topologies through composition of reduced-order device models, ii) an in-depth discussion of universal dual-port GFM control for emerging power systems, and iii) end-to-end stability conditions that cover a wide range of network topologies, emerging technologies, and legacy technologies. Finally, we validate our findings in detailed case studies.
Paper Structure (44 sections, 7 theorems, 19 equations, 17 figures, 5 tables)

This paper contains 44 sections, 7 theorems, 19 equations, 17 figures, 5 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

(LaSalle function) Under Cond. assump:identical.k.theta.gains-lemma:more.conservative.gains.assumption the function $V$ is positive definite and for $P_d=\mathbbl{0}_{n_d}$ its time derivative along the trajectories of eq:matrix.A restricted to $P_{{\text{zs}},\delta}=\mathbbl{0}_{|{\mathcal{N}}_{\t

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Hybrid ac/dc power grid with renewable generation, legacy generation, HVDC links, battery storage, and a synchronous condenser.
  • Figure 2: a) Graph representation of the system in Fig. \ref{['fig:grid']} and b) Kron-reduced graph obtained by removing interior nodes.
  • Figure 3: Power injections and bus voltages of a) a SM with a mechanical power source, b) a SM without a mechanical source (i.e., only rotating mass), c) a two-level VSC, and d) a dc bus with a dc power source.
  • Figure 4: Power generation of PV (left) as a function of dc voltage and irradiation (constant temperature of $25^\circ$ C) and WT (right) as a function of rotor speed and wind speed (zero blade pitch angle). The MPP and a (stable) operating point at 90% MPP are denoted by circles and triangles.
  • Figure 5: a) PV plant and dc/ac power converters b) PV plant dc collector network with dual active bridge converter, c) wind farm with PMSG WTs d) flywheel energy storage system and with dc network e) high voltage dc (HVDC) link, and f) low frequency ac (LFAC) connection.
  • ...and 12 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Proposition 3
  • Corollary 2
  • Example 1
  • Lemma 1