Efficient automatic segmentation for multi-level pulmonary arteries: The PARSE challenge
Gongning Luo, Kuanquan Wang, Jun Liu, Shuo Li, Xinjie Liang, Xiangyu Li, Shaowei Gan, Wei Wang, Suyu Dong, Wenyi Wang, Pengxin Yu, Enyou Liu, Hongrong Wei, Na Wang, Jia Guo, Huiqi Li, Zhao Zhang, Ziwei Zhao, Na Gao, Nan An, Ashkan Pakzad, Bojidar Rangelov, Jiaqi Dou, Song Tian, Zeyu Liu, Yi Wang, Ampatishan Sivalingam, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Zhaowen Qiu, Xin Gao
TL;DR
This work introduces PARSE, the first public MICCAI challenge to jointly segment main and branch pulmonary arteries in CTPA while explicitly balancing segmentation accuracy with inference efficiency. It provides a large-scale dataset, a multi-level evaluation framework (DSC/HD95) augmented with efficiency metrics (RT and GPU memory) and a weighted scheme that prioritizes branch PA, reflecting clinical needs. The paper analyzes the top-10 methods, detailing diverse strategies such as lightweight U-Net variants, ROI-focused preprocessing, skeleton or skeleton-inspired losses, coarse-to-fine localization, and selective postprocessing, and discusses how preprocessing, augmentation, and inference choices drive performance. Key findings show that branch PA remains more challenging than main PA, that accuracy and efficiency must be balanced, and that robust multi-level evaluation is essential for meaningful comparisons and future algorithm development in pulmonary vessel segmentation.
Abstract
Efficient automatic segmentation of multi-level (i.e. main and branch) pulmonary arteries (PA) in CTPA images plays a significant role in clinical applications. However, most existing methods concentrate only on main PA or branch PA segmentation separately and ignore segmentation efficiency. Besides, there is no public large-scale dataset focused on PA segmentation, which makes it highly challenging to compare the different methods. To benchmark multi-level PA segmentation algorithms, we organized the first \textbf{P}ulmonary \textbf{AR}tery \textbf{SE}gmentation (PARSE) challenge. On the one hand, we focus on both the main PA and the branch PA segmentation. On the other hand, for better clinical application, we assign the same score weight to segmentation efficiency (mainly running time and GPU memory consumption during inference) while ensuring PA segmentation accuracy. We present a summary of the top algorithms and offer some suggestions for efficient and accurate multi-level PA automatic segmentation. We provide the PARSE challenge as open-access for the community to benchmark future algorithm developments at \url{https://parse2022.grand-challenge.org/Parse2022/}.
