Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sets with dependent elements: A formalization of Castoriadis' notion of magma

Athanassios Tzouvaras

Abstract

We present a formalization of collections that Cornelius Castoriadis calls ``magmas'', especially the property which mainly characterizes them and distinguishes them from the usual cantorian sets. It is the property of their elements to {\em depend} on other elements, either in a one-way or a two-way manner, so that one cannot occur in a collection without the occurrence of those dependent on it. Such a dependence relation can be represented by a pre-order relation $\preccurlyeq$ Then, working in a mild strengthening of the theory ${\rm ZFA}$, where $A$ is an infinite set of atoms equipped with a primitive pre-ordering $\preccurlyeq$, the class of magmas over $A$ is represented by the class $LO(A,\preccurlyeq)$ of nonempty open subsets of $A$ with respect to the lower topology of $\langle A,\preccurlyeq\rangle$. Next the pre-ordering $\preccurlyeq$ is shifted (by a kind of simulation) to a pre-ordering $\preccurlyeq^+$ on ${\cal P}(A)$, which turns out to satisfy the same non-minimality condition as well, and which, happily, when restricted to $LO(A,\preccurlyeq)$ coincides with $\subseteq$. This allows us to define a hierarchy $M_α(A)$, along all ordinals $α\geq 1$, the``magmatic hierarchy'', such that $M_1(A)=LO(A,\preccurlyeq)$, $M_{α+1}(A)=LO(M_α(A),\subseteq)$, and $M_α(A)=\bigcup_{β<α}M_β(A)$, for a limit ordinal $α$. For every $α\geq 1$, $M_α(A)\subseteq V_α(A)$, where $V_α(A)$ are the levels of the universe $V(A)$ of ${\rm ZFA}$. The class $M(A)=\bigcup_{α\geq 1}M_α(A)$ is the ``magmatic universe above $A$.''

Sets with dependent elements: A formalization of Castoriadis' notion of magma

Abstract

We present a formalization of collections that Cornelius Castoriadis calls ``magmas'', especially the property which mainly characterizes them and distinguishes them from the usual cantorian sets. It is the property of their elements to {\em depend} on other elements, either in a one-way or a two-way manner, so that one cannot occur in a collection without the occurrence of those dependent on it. Such a dependence relation can be represented by a pre-order relation Then, working in a mild strengthening of the theory , where is an infinite set of atoms equipped with a primitive pre-ordering , the class of magmas over is represented by the class of nonempty open subsets of with respect to the lower topology of . Next the pre-ordering is shifted (by a kind of simulation) to a pre-ordering on , which turns out to satisfy the same non-minimality condition as well, and which, happily, when restricted to coincides with . This allows us to define a hierarchy , along all ordinals , the``magmatic hierarchy'', such that , , and , for a limit ordinal . For every , , where are the levels of the universe of . The class is the ``magmatic universe above .''
Paper Structure (4 sections, 17 theorems, 18 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 17 theorems, 18 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.3

Let $x\in LO(A,\preccurlyeq)$. The following are equivalent. (i) $x$ is minimal. (ii) $(\forall a\in x)(x=pr(a))$. (iii) $(\forall a\in x)(x=[a])$.

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • Corollary 3.3
  • Definition 4.1
  • Lemma 4.2
  • ...and 11 more