Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Completion of Matrices with Low Description Complexity

Erwin Riegler, Günther Koliander, David Stotz, Helmut Bölcskei

TL;DR

The goal is the characterization of the number of linear measurements, with an emphasis on rank-$1$ measurements, needed for the existence of an algorithm that yields reconstruction, either perfect, with probability 1, or with arbitrarily small probability of error, depending on the setup.

Abstract

We propose a theory for matrix completion that goes beyond the low-rank structure commonly considered in the literature and applies to general matrices of low description complexity. Specifically, complexity of the sets of matrices encompassed by the theory is measured in terms of Hausdorff and upper Minkowski dimensions. Our goal is the characterization of the number of linear measurements, with an emphasis on rank-$1$ measurements, needed for the existence of an algorithm that yields reconstruction, either perfect, with probability 1, or with arbitrarily small probability of error, depending on the setup. Concretely, we show that matrices taken from a set $\mathcal{U}$ such that $\mathcal{U}-\mathcal{U}$ has Hausdorff dimension $s$ can be recovered from $k>s$ measurements, and random matrices supported on a set $\mathcal{U}$ of Hausdorff dimension $s$ can be recovered with probability 1 from $k>s$ measurements. What is more, we establish the existence of recovery mappings that are robust against additive perturbations or noise in the measurements. Concretely, we show that there are $β$-Hölder continuous mappings recovering matrices taken from a set of upper Minkowski dimension $s$ from $k>2s/(1-β)$ measurements and, with arbitrarily small probability of error, random matrices supported on a set of upper Minkowski dimension $s$ from $k>s/(1-β)$ measurements. The numerous concrete examples we consider include low-rank matrices, sparse matrices, QR decompositions with sparse R-components, and matrices of fractal nature.

Completion of Matrices with Low Description Complexity

TL;DR

The goal is the characterization of the number of linear measurements, with an emphasis on rank- measurements, needed for the existence of an algorithm that yields reconstruction, either perfect, with probability 1, or with arbitrarily small probability of error, depending on the setup.

Abstract

We propose a theory for matrix completion that goes beyond the low-rank structure commonly considered in the literature and applies to general matrices of low description complexity. Specifically, complexity of the sets of matrices encompassed by the theory is measured in terms of Hausdorff and upper Minkowski dimensions. Our goal is the characterization of the number of linear measurements, with an emphasis on rank- measurements, needed for the existence of an algorithm that yields reconstruction, either perfect, with probability 1, or with arbitrarily small probability of error, depending on the setup. Concretely, we show that matrices taken from a set such that has Hausdorff dimension can be recovered from measurements, and random matrices supported on a set of Hausdorff dimension can be recovered with probability 1 from measurements. What is more, we establish the existence of recovery mappings that are robust against additive perturbations or noise in the measurements. Concretely, we show that there are -Hölder continuous mappings recovering matrices taken from a set of upper Minkowski dimension from measurements and, with arbitrarily small probability of error, random matrices supported on a set of upper Minkowski dimension from measurements. The numerous concrete examples we consider include low-rank matrices, sparse matrices, QR decompositions with sparse R-components, and matrices of fractal nature.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 20 theorems, 110 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 20 theorems, 110 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

For every nonempty set $\mathcal{U}\subseteq\mathbb R^{m\times n}$, the following holds:

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 33 more