Learning-based Position and Stiffness Feedforward Control of Antagonistic Soft Pneumatic Actuators using Gaussian Processes
Tim-Lukas Habich, Sarah Kleinjohann, Moritz Schappler
TL;DR
This paper tackles the challenge of simultaneously controlling the position $q$ and stiffness $s$ of antagonistic soft pneumatic actuators without relying on analytical models. It introduces a modular, 3D-printed VSA and trains two Gaussian process models to map the state $(q,s)$ to the actuator pressures $(p_1,p_2)$, forming a feedforward control that is supplemented by a small PI feedback on angle. The approach achieves an average feedforward error of $11.5\%$ of the total pressure range, and experiments show successful continuous adjustment of both position and stiffness across a range of configurations, demonstrating the method’s universality for VSAs. The work highlights the potential of GP-based learning for data-driven stiffness control in soft robotics, with implications for safer human-robot interaction and versatile manipulation in constrained environments.
Abstract
Variable stiffness actuator (VSA) designs are manifold. Conventional model-based control of these nonlinear systems is associated with high effort and design-dependent assumptions. In contrast, machine learning offers a promising alternative as models are trained on real measured data and nonlinearities are inherently taken into account. Our work presents a universal, learning-based approach for position and stiffness control of soft actuators. After introducing a soft pneumatic VSA, the model is learned with input-output data. For this purpose, a test bench was set up which enables automated measurement of the variable joint stiffness. During control, Gaussian processes are used to predict pressures for achieving desired position and stiffness. The feedforward error is on average 11.5% of the total pressure range and is compensated by feedback control. Experiments with the soft actuator show that the learning-based approach allows continuous adjustment of position and stiffness without model knowledge.
