Stochastic Simulated Quantum Annealing for Fast Solution of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
Naoya Onizawa, Ryoma Sasaki, Duckgyu Shin, Warren J. Gross, Takahiro Hanyu
TL;DR
Stochastic simulated quantum annealing (SSQA) targets large-scale combinatorial optimization by emulating quantum annealing on classical hardware through quantum Monte Carlo with $R$ replicas coupled by $J_{\perp}$. The method updates spin states in parallel using integral stochastic computing, enabling rapid traversal of the energy landscape toward the global minimum, while preserving quantum-like correlations via the replica coupling. Evaluations on graph isomorphism problems up to $N\approx 2500$ spins show SSQA delivers an order-of-magnitude reduction in time-to-solution (TTS) compared with SSA and can solve problem sizes roughly two orders of magnitude larger than QA and about 25 times larger than SA for similar convergence probabilities. These results position SSQA as a scalable, hardware-friendly approach for fully connected Ising models, with potential for substantial speedups in real-world GI and related optimization tasks.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce stochastic simulated quantum annealing (SSQA) for large-scale combinatorial optimization problems. SSQA is designed based on stochastic computing and quantum Monte Carlo, which can simulate quantum annealing (QA) by using multiple replicas of spins (probabilistic bits) in classical computing. The use of stochastic computing leads to an efficient parallel spin-state update algorithm, enabling quick search for a solution around the global minimum energy. Therefore, SSQA realizes quantum-like annealing for large-scale problems and can handle fully connected models in combinatorial optimization, unlike QA. The proposed method is evaluated in MATLAB on graph isomorphism problems, which are typical combinatorial optimization problems. The proposed method achieves a convergence speed an order of magnitude faster than a conventional stochastic simulaated annealing method. Additionally, it can handle a 100-times larger problem size compared to QA and a 25-times larger problem size compared to a traditional SA method, respectively, for similar convergence probabilities.
