A remark on a result of Huber and Kahn
Somayeh Habibi, Farhad Rahmati
TL;DR
The paper addresses the inverse implication of Huber–Kahn's result for principal bundles: whether the mixed Tate property of the base forces the total space to be mixed Tate for a principal $G$-bundle with split reductive $G$. It employs the slice filtration framework and motivic fundamental invariants $c_n(M)$ to characterize mixed Tate motives and uses a torus-bundle filtration as a stepping stone to handle $G$-bundles, including a reduction to a sequence of $\mathbb{G}_m$-bundles and projective bundle arguments. The main contributions are (i) establishing that if the base $Y$ is (stratified) mixed Tate then the total space $X$ is mixed Tate, and (ii) the converse in the smooth base case: if $M(X)$ is mixed Tate then $M(Y)$ is mixed Tate, under either Zariski-local triviality of $X$ or $k=\mathbb{C}$; with corollaries on the finiteness of Chow groups over finite fields. These results facilitate computing motives of quotient varieties under reductive group actions and deepen understanding of how mixed Tate properties propagate through principal bundles.
Abstract
A. Huber and B. Kahn construct a relative slice filtration on the motive M(X) associated to a principal T-bundle X over a smooth scheme Y. As a consequence of their result, one can observe that the mixed Tateness of the motive M(Y) implies that the motive M(X) is mixed Tate. In this note we prove the inverse implication for a principal G-bundle, for a split reductive group G.
