Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions VIII. Excluding a forest in (theta, prism)-free graphs

Tara Abrishami, Bogdan Alecu, Maria Chudnovsky, Sepehr Hajebi, Sophie Spirkl

TL;DR

The paper characterizes induced-subgraph obstructions in $(\theta, \mathrm{prism})$-free graphs with large treewidth, showing that forests are exactly the graphs that modulate this class. It develops a structural framework built around pyramid-induced strip-structures and jewels to decompose the graph around a trapped apex, then leverages a connectivity/seed approach to bound treewidth. Using a block-to-tree methodology and results of Kierstead–Penrice, it proves that for any tree $F$ and any $t$, graphs in $\mathcal{C}_t(F)$ have bounded treewidth, i.e., there exists $\tau(F,t)$ with $\mathrm{tw}(G) \le \tau(F,t)$. Consequently forests modulate the class of $(\theta, \mathrm{prism})$-free graphs, extending modulation results known for even-hole-free graphs to this broader setting and advancing understanding of induced-subgraph obstructions in high-treewidth graphs.

Abstract

Given a graph $H$, we prove that every (theta, prism)-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a large clique or an induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, if and only if $H$ is a forest.

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions VIII. Excluding a forest in (theta, prism)-free graphs

TL;DR

The paper characterizes induced-subgraph obstructions in -free graphs with large treewidth, showing that forests are exactly the graphs that modulate this class. It develops a structural framework built around pyramid-induced strip-structures and jewels to decompose the graph around a trapped apex, then leverages a connectivity/seed approach to bound treewidth. Using a block-to-tree methodology and results of Kierstead–Penrice, it proves that for any tree and any , graphs in have bounded treewidth, i.e., there exists with . Consequently forests modulate the class of -free graphs, extending modulation results known for even-hole-free graphs to this broader setting and advancing understanding of induced-subgraph obstructions in high-treewidth graphs.

Abstract

Given a graph , we prove that every (theta, prism)-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a large clique or an induced subgraph isomorphic to , if and only if is a forest.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 29 theorems, 10 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 29 theorems, 10 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For every integer $t\geq 1$ there exists $w=w(t)\geq 1$ such that every graph of treewidth more than $w$ contains a subdivision of $W_{t \times t}$ as a subgraph.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: $W_{5 \times 5}$
  • Figure 2: Theta, pyramid and prism. The dashed lines represent paths of length at least one.

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Theorem 1.1: Robertson and Seymour RS-GMV
  • Theorem 1.2: Sintiari and Trotignon layered-wheels
  • Theorem 1.3: Sintiari and Trotignon layered-wheels
  • Theorem 1.4: Korhonen Korhonen
  • Theorem 1.5: Abrishami, Alecu, Chudnovsky, Hajebi and Spirkl twvii
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 2.1: Menger Menger
  • Theorem 2.2: Erde and Weiß auer tighttw, see also Grohe
  • ...and 33 more