Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hypergraphs with Polynomial Representation: Introducing $r$-splits

François Pitois, Mohammed Haddad, Hamida Seba, Olivier Togni

TL;DR

This work introduces $r$-splits as a rank-$$r$ generalization of split decomposition, framing the collection of all $r$-splits of a graph on $n$ vertices as a hypergraph $H_r(G)$. Leveraging a closure framework with ${<\cdot\!>_r}$ and a generalized notion of orthogonality, the authors prove that $H_r(G)$ admits a compact representation with $\mathcal{O}(n^{r+1})$ hyperedges via a polynomial decomposition into essential hyperedges. They define $r$-orthogonality and $r$-cross-free hypergraphs to analyze structural sparsity, showing upper bounds for cross-free closures and constructing families achieving $\Omega(n^r)$ hyperedges for representation, thereby establishing a gap between lower and upper bounds. The results lay groundwork for broader decompositions akin to rank-width, while highlighting potential for efficient representations and highlighting fundamental limits via lower-bound constructions. Overall, the paper contributes to understanding how rank-based cuts induce hypergraph representations and how closure and orthogonality notions control representational complexity in this setting.

Abstract

Inspired by the split decomposition of graphs and rank-width, we introduce the notion of $r$-splits. We focus on the family of $r$-splits of a graph of order $n$, and we prove that it forms a hypergraph with several properties. We prove that such hypergraphs can be represented using only $\mathcal O(n^{r+1})$ of its hyperedges, despite its potentially exponential number of hyperedges. We also prove that there exist hypergraphs that need at least $Ω(n^r)$ hyperedges to be represented, using a generalization of set orthogonality.

Hypergraphs with Polynomial Representation: Introducing $r$-splits

TL;DR

This work introduces -splits as a rank-$ generalization of split decomposition, framing the collection of all -splits of a graph on vertices as a hypergraph . Leveraging a closure framework with and a generalized notion of orthogonality, the authors prove that admits a compact representation with hyperedges via a polynomial decomposition into essential hyperedges. They define -orthogonality and -cross-free hypergraphs to analyze structural sparsity, showing upper bounds for cross-free closures and constructing families achieving hyperedges for representation, thereby establishing a gap between lower and upper bounds. The results lay groundwork for broader decompositions akin to rank-width, while highlighting potential for efficient representations and highlighting fundamental limits via lower-bound constructions. Overall, the paper contributes to understanding how rank-based cuts induce hypergraph representations and how closure and orthogonality notions control representational complexity in this setting.

Abstract

Inspired by the split decomposition of graphs and rank-width, we introduce the notion of -splits. We focus on the family of -splits of a graph of order , and we prove that it forms a hypergraph with several properties. We prove that such hypergraphs can be represented using only of its hyperedges, despite its potentially exponential number of hyperedges. We also prove that there exist hypergraphs that need at least hyperedges to be represented, using a generalization of set orthogonality.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 34 theorems, 15 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 13 sections, 34 theorems, 15 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1

For all $X \subseteq V$, we have $\rho(X) \leq |X|$ and $\rho(X)=\rho(V \setminus X)$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: An example of a split
  • Figure 2: A graph and its adjacency matrix
  • Figure 3: The cut $(\{a, b, c, d, e\},\{f, g, h, i\})$ is a 2-split

Theorems & Definitions (77)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Example 1
  • Lemma 1
  • Lemma 2: oum2006approximating
  • Definition 3: oum2020rank
  • Lemma 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • ...and 67 more