Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Improved Kernel Alignment Regret Bound for Online Kernel Learning

Junfan Li, Shizhong Liao

TL;DR

This paper improves the kernel alignment regret bound for online kernel learning in the regime of the Hinge loss function and extends the algorithm to batch learning and obtains a O(T^{-1}(E[A_T])^{1/2}) excess risk bound which improves the previous O(-1/ 2}) bound.

Abstract

In this paper, we improve the kernel alignment regret bound for online kernel learning in the regime of the Hinge loss function. Previous algorithm achieves a regret of $O((\mathcal{A}_TT\ln{T})^{\frac{1}{4}})$ at a computational complexity (space and per-round time) of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_TT\ln{T}})$, where $\mathcal{A}_T$ is called \textit{kernel alignment}. We propose an algorithm whose regret bound and computational complexity are better than previous results. Our results depend on the decay rate of eigenvalues of the kernel matrix. If the eigenvalues of the kernel matrix decay exponentially, then our algorithm enjoys a regret of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_T})$ at a computational complexity of $O(\ln^2{T})$. Otherwise, our algorithm enjoys a regret of $O((\mathcal{A}_TT)^{\frac{1}{4}})$ at a computational complexity of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_TT})$. We extend our algorithm to batch learning and obtain a $O(\frac{1}{T}\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\mathcal{A}_T]})$ excess risk bound which improves the previous $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ bound.

Improved Kernel Alignment Regret Bound for Online Kernel Learning

TL;DR

This paper improves the kernel alignment regret bound for online kernel learning in the regime of the Hinge loss function and extends the algorithm to batch learning and obtains a O(T^{-1}(E[A_T])^{1/2}) excess risk bound which improves the previous O(-1/ 2}) bound.

Abstract

In this paper, we improve the kernel alignment regret bound for online kernel learning in the regime of the Hinge loss function. Previous algorithm achieves a regret of at a computational complexity (space and per-round time) of , where is called \textit{kernel alignment}. We propose an algorithm whose regret bound and computational complexity are better than previous results. Our results depend on the decay rate of eigenvalues of the kernel matrix. If the eigenvalues of the kernel matrix decay exponentially, then our algorithm enjoys a regret of at a computational complexity of . Otherwise, our algorithm enjoys a regret of at a computational complexity of . We extend our algorithm to batch learning and obtain a excess risk bound which improves the previous bound.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 9 theorems, 97 equations, 5 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 27 sections, 9 theorems, 97 equations, 5 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $S_1=\emptyset$ and $\mathrm{ALD}_t$ be defined in eq:AAAI23:POMD:second_updating:ALD where $\alpha=D\cdot T^{-2\zeta}$ for a certain $\zeta\in(0,1]$. For all $t\leq T-1$, if $\mathrm{ALD}_t$ does not hold, then $S_{t+1}=S_t\cup\{(\mathbf{x}_t,y_t)\}$. Otherwise, $S_{t+1}=S_t$. Let $\{\lambda_i\

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof : Proof Sketch of Theorem \ref{['thm:AAAI2023:size_budget']}
  • Lemma 1: Theorem 4.3.28 in HornMatrix2012Matrix
  • Theorem 2: Regret bound
  • Corollary 1
  • Remark 1
  • Theorem 3: Excess risk bound
  • Lemma 2
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lemma:AAAI23:auxilimary_lemma_1']}
  • Lemma 3
  • ...and 6 more