Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cliques and independent subgroups of the Birkhoff polytope graph

Zejun Huang, Chi-Kwong Li, Eric Swartz, Nung-Sing Sze

TL;DR

This paper studies the cliques and independent subgroups of the Birkhoff polytope graph $G(\Omega_n)$, the Cayley graph of $\mathrm{Sym}(n)$ with generator set of cycles. It establishes both lower and upper bounds on the clique number $\omega(n)$ and fully characterizes maximum 2-cycle and 3-cycle cliques in many regimes, including an Erdős–Ko–Rado-type bound for 3-cycles: if $K \subseteq \mathrm{Sym}(n)$ has the property that $\delta_1^{-1}\delta_2$ is a single cycle for all $\delta_1,\delta_2 \in K$, then $|K| \le \lfloor (n-1)^2/4\rfloor$. It also constructs maximal independent subgroups of $\mathrm{Sym}(n)$, notably for even $n=2k$ the independent set $G_n$ with $|G_n|=k!2^{k-1}$, and proves maximality (every nontrivial coset contains a cycle). The results connect to extremal set theory and point to extensions toward transportation polytopes and higher-order doubly stochastic tensors as future directions.

Abstract

The Birkhoff polytope $Ω_n$ is the polytope of doubly stochastic matrices of order $n$. The Birkhoff polytope graph $G(Ω_n)$ is the skeleton of $Ω_n$; it is the Cayley graph whose vertex set consists of the elements of the symmetric group ${\rm Sym}(n)$ of degree $n$, where two permutations are adjacent if one equals the product of the other with a cycle. We study the combinatorial structure of this graph, focusing on its maximal and maximum cliques and on its independent subgroups (subgroups of ${\rm Sym}(n)$ whose elements are pairwise nonadjacent in the graph). We obtain maximal subgroups of $G(Ω_n)$ and establish both a lower bound and an upper bound for its clique number. Especially, we prove that if $K$ is a subset of ${\rm Sym}(n)$ consisting of 3-cycle permutations such that $δ_1^{-1}δ_2$ is a single cycle for all $δ_1,δ_2\in K$, then the maximum size of $K$ is $\lfloor (n-1)^2/4\rfloor$, which can be viewed as an Erdős-Ko-Rado-type theorem for ${\rm Sym}(n)$.

Cliques and independent subgroups of the Birkhoff polytope graph

TL;DR

This paper studies the cliques and independent subgroups of the Birkhoff polytope graph , the Cayley graph of with generator set of cycles. It establishes both lower and upper bounds on the clique number and fully characterizes maximum 2-cycle and 3-cycle cliques in many regimes, including an Erdős–Ko–Rado-type bound for 3-cycles: if has the property that is a single cycle for all , then . It also constructs maximal independent subgroups of , notably for even the independent set with , and proves maximality (every nontrivial coset contains a cycle). The results connect to extremal set theory and point to extensions toward transportation polytopes and higher-order doubly stochastic tensors as future directions.

Abstract

The Birkhoff polytope is the polytope of doubly stochastic matrices of order . The Birkhoff polytope graph is the skeleton of ; it is the Cayley graph whose vertex set consists of the elements of the symmetric group of degree , where two permutations are adjacent if one equals the product of the other with a cycle. We study the combinatorial structure of this graph, focusing on its maximal and maximum cliques and on its independent subgroups (subgroups of whose elements are pairwise nonadjacent in the graph). We obtain maximal subgroups of and establish both a lower bound and an upper bound for its clique number. Especially, we prove that if is a subset of consisting of 3-cycle permutations such that is a single cycle for all , then the maximum size of is , which can be viewed as an Erdős-Ko-Rado-type theorem for .
Paper Structure (9 sections, 15 theorems, 63 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 15 theorems, 63 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $\sigma,\tau$ be two cycles in ${\rm Sym}(n)$ of length at least 3 and $\sigma\cap \tau=\{1,2\}$. Then $\sigma \tau$ is a cycle if and only if $(\sigma, \tau)$ has the form $((1,2,\ldots),(2,1,\ldots))$ or $((2,1,\ldots),(1,2,\ldots))$.

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2: HM
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4: WM
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Remark 2.8
  • Theorem 2.9
  • Theorem 2.10
  • ...and 9 more