Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Understanding Users' Interaction with Login Notifications

Philipp Markert, Leona Lassak, Maximilian Golla, Markus Dürmuth

TL;DR

Login notifications aim to inform users about recent sign-ins to prevent unauthorized access. The authors analyze the efficacy and usability of granted-access notifications through a 3-stage, deception-based user study ($n=229$) built on a baseline derived from $n=72$ real-world emails. They find that users easily identify legitimate logins but struggle to interpret and respond to unexpected or malicious logins, with only $22\%$ of malicious cases leading to password changes. The paper argues for contextualization (Why Notification), risk-based triggering, and broader remediation steps by service providers to enhance usable security. These findings offer concrete recommendations to reduce warning fatigue while improving account protection.

Abstract

Login notifications intend to inform users about sign-ins and help them protect their accounts from unauthorized access. Notifications are usually sent if a login deviates from previous ones, potentially indicating malicious activity. They contain information like the location, date, time, and device used to sign in. Users are challenged to verify whether they recognize the login (because it was them or someone they know) or to protect their account from unwanted access. In a user study, we explore users' comprehension, reactions, and expectations of login notifications. We utilize two treatments to measure users' behavior in response to notifications sent for a login they initiated or based on a malicious actor relying on statistical sign-in information. We find that users identify legitimate logins but need more support to halt malicious sign-ins. We discuss the identified problems and give recommendations for service providers to ensure usable and secure logins for everyone.

Understanding Users' Interaction with Login Notifications

TL;DR

Login notifications aim to inform users about recent sign-ins to prevent unauthorized access. The authors analyze the efficacy and usability of granted-access notifications through a 3-stage, deception-based user study () built on a baseline derived from real-world emails. They find that users easily identify legitimate logins but struggle to interpret and respond to unexpected or malicious logins, with only of malicious cases leading to password changes. The paper argues for contextualization (Why Notification), risk-based triggering, and broader remediation steps by service providers to enhance usable security. These findings offer concrete recommendations to reduce warning fatigue while improving account protection.

Abstract

Login notifications intend to inform users about sign-ins and help them protect their accounts from unauthorized access. Notifications are usually sent if a login deviates from previous ones, potentially indicating malicious activity. They contain information like the location, date, time, and device used to sign in. Users are challenged to verify whether they recognize the login (because it was them or someone they know) or to protect their account from unwanted access. In a user study, we explore users' comprehension, reactions, and expectations of login notifications. We utilize two treatments to measure users' behavior in response to notifications sent for a login they initiated or based on a malicious actor relying on statistical sign-in information. We find that users identify legitimate logins but need more support to halt malicious sign-ins. We discuss the identified problems and give recommendations for service providers to ensure usable and secure logins for everyone.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 6 figures, 6 tables)

This paper contains 29 sections, 6 figures, 6 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Real-world examples of the three sign-in notification types (logos removed due to copyright, cropped, as of Dec. 2023).
  • Figure 2: The information included in login notifications for granted access notifications ($n=72$) sent by real-world services.
  • Figure 3: The baseline login notification, which we derived from ($n=72$) real-world notifications. For our user study, we rebranded the text and the look to match the study website.
  • Figure 4: Breakdown of treatments into participants who have or have not changed their password and their reasoning.
  • Figure 5: Helpfulness of the details for deciding (\ref{['app:part2:q5']}).
  • ...and 1 more figures