Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Polyak momentum variants of the greedy deterministic single and multiple row-action methods

Nian-Ci Wu, Qian Zuo, Yatian Wang

TL;DR

This work blends greedy deterministic row-action strategies with Polyak momentum to accelerate Kaczmarz-type solvers for consistent linear systems. By introducing the mMWRK and mFDBK variants, the authors prove convergence to the minimum-norm least-squares solution and establish linear rates under suitable choices of the step-size $\alpha$ and momentum $\beta$. Extensive numerical experiments on synthetic data and curve-fitting problems demonstrate that momentum variants achieve faster convergence and notable iteration-count reductions compared to their non-momentum counterparts. The results highlight the practical potential of deterministic greedy-row methods augmented with Polyak momentum for large-scale linear-systems tasks relevant to applications such as computer-aided geometric design.

Abstract

For solving a consistent system of linear equations, the classical row-action (also known as Kaczmarz) method is a simple while really effective iteration solver. Based on the greedy index selection strategy and Polyak's heavy-ball momentum acceleration technique, we propose two deterministic row-action methods and establish the corresponding convergence theory. We show that our algorithm can linearly converge to a least-squares solution with minimum Euclidean norm. Several numerical studies have been presented to corroborate our theoretical findings. Real-world applications, such as data fitting in computer-aided geometry design, are also presented for illustrative purposes.

On the Polyak momentum variants of the greedy deterministic single and multiple row-action methods

TL;DR

This work blends greedy deterministic row-action strategies with Polyak momentum to accelerate Kaczmarz-type solvers for consistent linear systems. By introducing the mMWRK and mFDBK variants, the authors prove convergence to the minimum-norm least-squares solution and establish linear rates under suitable choices of the step-size and momentum . Extensive numerical experiments on synthetic data and curve-fitting problems demonstrate that momentum variants achieve faster convergence and notable iteration-count reductions compared to their non-momentum counterparts. The results highlight the practical potential of deterministic greedy-row methods augmented with Polyak momentum for large-scale linear-systems tasks relevant to applications such as computer-aided geometric design.

Abstract

For solving a consistent system of linear equations, the classical row-action (also known as Kaczmarz) method is a simple while really effective iteration solver. Based on the greedy index selection strategy and Polyak's heavy-ball momentum acceleration technique, we propose two deterministic row-action methods and establish the corresponding convergence theory. We show that our algorithm can linearly converge to a least-squares solution with minimum Euclidean norm. Several numerical studies have been presented to corroborate our theoretical findings. Real-world applications, such as data fitting in computer-aided geometry design, are also presented for illustrative purposes.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 5 theorems, 53 equations, 8 figures, 6 tables, 4 algorithms)

This paper contains 13 sections, 5 theorems, 53 equations, 8 figures, 6 tables, 4 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

19DG Let $A\in \mathbb{C}^{m\times n}$ be a matrix without any zero rows and $b \in \mathbb{C}^{m}$. The iteration sequence $\left\{x^{(k )}\right\}_{k=0}^{\infty}$, generated by the MWRK method starting from any initial guess $x^{(0)} \in {\mathcal{R}}(A^\ast)$, exists and converges to the unique l for $k=0,1,2,\cdots$, where the constant $\widetilde{\gamma} = \max_{i\in [m]}\left\{ \sum_{j=1,j\n

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Geometric interpretation of the mMWRK (a) and MWRK (b) 19DG77McCormick iterations.
  • Figure 2: The number of iteration steps of mMWRK (left) and mFDBK (right) with different $(\alpha,\beta)$ for solving a consistent linear systems, where the test matrix is generated by randn$(m,n)$.
  • Figure 3: The number of iteration steps of mMWRK (left) and mFDBK (right) with different $(\alpha,\beta)$ for solving a consistent linear systems, where the test matrix is generated by randn$(m,n)$.
  • Figure 4: RSE versus IT obtained by mMWRK (a) and mFDBK (b) for Example \ref{['ERMR:example1']} when $m=15000$, $n=350$, $r = n/10$, and $\kappa = n/10$.
  • Figure 5: RSE versus IT obtained by mMWRK (a) and mFDBK (b) for Example \ref{['ERMR:example1']} when $m=350$, $n=15000$, $r = m/10$, and $\kappa = m/10$.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 3.4
  • Remark 3.5
  • Lemma 4.1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Remark 4.1
  • ...and 4 more