Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability of interval-valued functions on Riemannian manifolds

Hilal Ahmad Bhat, Akhlad Iqbal

TL;DR

The paper investigates generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability (gH-directional differentiability) of interval-valued functions on Riemannian manifolds and demonstrates that, in general, gH-directional differentiability is not equivalent to the directional differentiability of the center or half-width or of endpoint functions, countering claims valid only in special Hadamard contexts. It provides counterexamples showing convexity-at-a-point is insufficient for standard directional derivatives and clarifies when gH-differentiability can be expressed via component derivatives, including a condition of nondecreasing radius along geodesics. The work derives both necessary and sufficient results under cw-convexity and related assumptions, and highlights the limitations due to incompleteness of interval order. The findings have implications for developing KKT-type optimality conditions and numerical methods for interval-valued optimization in fuzzy or uncertain environments on manifolds.

Abstract

In this paper, we show that generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability of an interval-valued function (IVF) defined on Riemannian manifolds is not equivalent to the directional differentiability of its center and half-width functions and hence not to its end point functions. This contrasts with S.-L. Chen's \cite{chen} assertion which says the equivalence holds in terms of endpoint functions of an IVF which is defined on a Hadamard manifold. Additionally, the paper addresses some other inaccuracies which arise when assuming the convexity of a function at a single point in its domain. In light of these arguments, the paper presents some basic results that relate to both the convexity and directional differentiability of an IVF.

Generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability of interval-valued functions on Riemannian manifolds

TL;DR

The paper investigates generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability (gH-directional differentiability) of interval-valued functions on Riemannian manifolds and demonstrates that, in general, gH-directional differentiability is not equivalent to the directional differentiability of the center or half-width or of endpoint functions, countering claims valid only in special Hadamard contexts. It provides counterexamples showing convexity-at-a-point is insufficient for standard directional derivatives and clarifies when gH-differentiability can be expressed via component derivatives, including a condition of nondecreasing radius along geodesics. The work derives both necessary and sufficient results under cw-convexity and related assumptions, and highlights the limitations due to incompleteness of interval order. The findings have implications for developing KKT-type optimality conditions and numerical methods for interval-valued optimization in fuzzy or uncertain environments on manifolds.

Abstract

In this paper, we show that generalized Hukuhara directional differentiability of an interval-valued function (IVF) defined on Riemannian manifolds is not equivalent to the directional differentiability of its center and half-width functions and hence not to its end point functions. This contrasts with S.-L. Chen's \cite{chen} assertion which says the equivalence holds in terms of endpoint functions of an IVF which is defined on a Hadamard manifold. Additionally, the paper addresses some other inaccuracies which arise when assuming the convexity of a function at a single point in its domain. In light of these arguments, the paper presents some basic results that relate to both the convexity and directional differentiability of an IVF.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 111 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 111 equations.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • ...and 3 more