Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-cutoff Boltzmann equation with soft potentials in the whole space

Kleber Carrapatoso, Pierre Gervais

Abstract

We prove the existence and uniqueness of global solutions to the Boltzmann equation with non-cutoff soft potentials in the whole space when the initial data is a small perturbation of a Maxwellian with polynomial decay in velocity. Our method is based in the decomposition of the desired solution into two parts: one with polynomial decay in velocity satisfying the Boltzmann equation with only a dissipative part of the linearized operator ; the other with Gaussian decay in velocity verifying the Boltzmann equation with a coupling term.

Non-cutoff Boltzmann equation with soft potentials in the whole space

Abstract

We prove the existence and uniqueness of global solutions to the Boltzmann equation with non-cutoff soft potentials in the whole space when the initial data is a small perturbation of a Maxwellian with polynomial decay in velocity. Our method is based in the decomposition of the desired solution into two parts: one with polynomial decay in velocity satisfying the Boltzmann equation with only a dissipative part of the linearized operator ; the other with Gaussian decay in velocity verifying the Boltzmann equation with a coupling term.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 24 theorems, 371 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 25 sections, 24 theorems, 371 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume eq:noncutoff1--eq:noncutoff2 hold. Consider $k > 13/2 + 7|\gamma| / 2 + 8s$ and define the weight function $m = \langle v \rangle^k$. There exists ${\varepsilon}_0 > 0$ small enough such that any initial data $f_0 \in \mathbf{X}(m)$ satisfying $\| f_0 \|_{\mathbf{X}(m)} \leqslant {\varepsilon If moreover the initial data $\widehat{f}_0 \in L^p_\xi L^2_v(\langle v \rangle^{-8s} m)$ satisfies

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The changes of variables $(v, v') \rightarrow (v, v_*)$ and $(v', v_*) \rightarrow (v, v_*)$.

Theorems & Definitions (41)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4: Cancellation lemma
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • ...and 31 more