Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Relative elegance and cartesian cubes with one connection

Evan Cavallo, Christian Sattler

TL;DR

The work constructs a robust constructive model for homotopy type theory by placing a cubical-type model on cartesian cubical sets with one connection and proving a Quillen equivalence to the classical Kan–Quillen model on simplicial sets, thereby presenting an $\infty$-groupoid-presenting, constructive interpretation of HoTT. The core technical innovations include (i) developing a disjunctive-cubical, one-connection cube category $\square_{\lor}$, (ii) establishing a cubical-type model structure via a fibration-extension framework and universes, (iii) leveraging relative elegance to relate the non-Reedy cube setting to the simplicial world, and (iv) showing that the resulting model is Quillen-equivalent to the Kan–Quillen model and coincides with Cisinski’s test model structure. The results extend cubical approaches to a constructive-categorical setting and provide a concrete bridge between cubical and simplicial perspectives on $\infty$-groupoids, with implications for constructive HoTT interpretations and universe constructions. Overall, the paper advances a viable, category-theoretically rigorous path to obtaining constructive models of HoTT that faithfully present $\infty$-groupoids while handling non-Reedy cube categories via relative elegance and idempotent completion.

Abstract

We establish a Quillen equivalence between the Kan-Quillen model structure and a model structure, derived from a cubical model of homotopy type theory, on the category of cartesian cubical sets with one connection. We thereby identify a second model structure which both constructively models homotopy type theory and presents infinity-groupoids, the first example being the equivariant cartesian model of Awodey-Cavallo-Coquand-Riehl-Sattler.

Relative elegance and cartesian cubes with one connection

TL;DR

The work constructs a robust constructive model for homotopy type theory by placing a cubical-type model on cartesian cubical sets with one connection and proving a Quillen equivalence to the classical Kan–Quillen model on simplicial sets, thereby presenting an -groupoid-presenting, constructive interpretation of HoTT. The core technical innovations include (i) developing a disjunctive-cubical, one-connection cube category , (ii) establishing a cubical-type model structure via a fibration-extension framework and universes, (iii) leveraging relative elegance to relate the non-Reedy cube setting to the simplicial world, and (iv) showing that the resulting model is Quillen-equivalent to the Kan–Quillen model and coincides with Cisinski’s test model structure. The results extend cubical approaches to a constructive-categorical setting and provide a concrete bridge between cubical and simplicial perspectives on -groupoids, with implications for constructive HoTT interpretations and universe constructions. Overall, the paper advances a viable, category-theoretically rigorous path to obtaining constructive models of HoTT that faithfully present -groupoids while handling non-Reedy cube categories via relative elegance and idempotent completion.

Abstract

We establish a Quillen equivalence between the Kan-Quillen model structure and a model structure, derived from a cubical model of homotopy type theory, on the category of cartesian cubical sets with one connection. We thereby identify a second model structure which both constructively models homotopy type theory and presents infinity-groupoids, the first example being the equivariant cartesian model of Awodey-Cavallo-Coquand-Riehl-Sattler.
Paper Structure (45 sections, 109 theorems, 17 equations)

This paper contains 45 sections, 109 theorems, 17 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.14

Let $f \colon r \to s$, $g \colon s \to t$ be maps in a Reedy category. If $gf$ is a lowering map, then so is $g$. Dually, if $gf$ is a raising map, then so is $f$.

Theorems & Definitions (283)

  • Definition 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Definition 2.10
  • Definition 2.11
  • Definition 2.13
  • ...and 273 more