Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The B(G)-parametrization of the local Langlands correspondence

Alexander Bertoloni Meli, Masao Oi

TL;DR

The paper develops a canonical extension of the local Langlands correspondence from the basic B(G)_{bas}-twist (basic inner forms) to the full Kottwitz set B(G), for local fields and both quasi-split and inner-twisted forms. It shows that a B(L)_{bas}-LLC for Levi subgroups L suffices to induce a B(G)-LLC for G by composing L-parameters with the L-embedding L ↪ G and by using the representation theory of the disconnected group S_{φ}. The construction yields a natural, choice-independent bijection between Irr(S_{φ}) and the union of L-packets Π_{φ}(G_b) over all b ∈ B(G), compatible with duality and endoscopy, and compatible with the broader Fargues–Scholze program linking G-bundles and L-parameters. A regular-part endoscopic identity is established to relate transfers of stable distributions on endoscopic groups to the regular parts of representations in Π_{φ}(G_b), illustrating the interplay between Langlands data and endoscopic transfer in the non-basic setting.

Abstract

This article is on the parametrization of the local Langlands correspondence over local fields for non-quasi-split groups according to the philosophy of Vogan. We show that a parametrization indexed by the basic part of the Kottwitz set (which is an extension of the set of pure inner twists) implies a parametrization indexed by the full Kottwitz set. On the Galois side, we consider irreducible algebraic representations of the full centralizer group of the $L$-parameter (i.e not a component group). When $F$ is a $p$-adic field, we discuss a generalization of the endoscopic character identity.

The B(G)-parametrization of the local Langlands correspondence

TL;DR

The paper develops a canonical extension of the local Langlands correspondence from the basic B(G)_{bas}-twist (basic inner forms) to the full Kottwitz set B(G), for local fields and both quasi-split and inner-twisted forms. It shows that a B(L)_{bas}-LLC for Levi subgroups L suffices to induce a B(G)-LLC for G by composing L-parameters with the L-embedding L ↪ G and by using the representation theory of the disconnected group S_{φ}. The construction yields a natural, choice-independent bijection between Irr(S_{φ}) and the union of L-packets Π_{φ}(G_b) over all b ∈ B(G), compatible with duality and endoscopy, and compatible with the broader Fargues–Scholze program linking G-bundles and L-parameters. A regular-part endoscopic identity is established to relate transfers of stable distributions on endoscopic groups to the regular parts of representations in Π_{φ}(G_b), illustrating the interplay between Langlands data and endoscopic transfer in the non-basic setting.

Abstract

This article is on the parametrization of the local Langlands correspondence over local fields for non-quasi-split groups according to the philosophy of Vogan. We show that a parametrization indexed by the basic part of the Kottwitz set (which is an extension of the set of pure inner twists) implies a parametrization indexed by the full Kottwitz set. On the Galois side, we consider irreducible algebraic representations of the full centralizer group of the -parameter (i.e not a component group). When is a -adic field, we discuss a generalization of the endoscopic character identity.
Paper Structure (31 sections, 42 theorems, 100 equations)

This paper contains 31 sections, 42 theorems, 100 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $G$ be a quasi-split connected reductive group with a fixed Whittaker datum $\mathfrak{w}$. Suppose that there is an LLC for $G$ and its $B(G)_{\mathrm{bas}}$-inner twists as well as an LLC for each proper Levi subgroup $L \subset G$ and its $B(L)_{\mathrm{bas}}$-inner twists. Then there is a na

Theorems & Definitions (97)

  • Conjecture 1.1: fargues--scholze
  • Theorem 1.2: See §\ref{['s: basiccorrespondence']}, §\ref{['s: theconstruction']}
  • Theorem 1.3: Theorem \ref{['thm: ECI']}
  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3: AcharHardestyRicherepthrydisconnected
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.5
  • ...and 87 more