Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Geometric rigidity of quasi-isometries in horospherical products

Tom Ferragut

TL;DR

This work proves geometric rigidity for quasi-isometries between horospherical products $X\bowtie Y$ of Gromov hyperbolic, Busemann spaces under the condition $m>n$ (and similarly for the primed pair). By developing a robust toolkit—ε-monotone quasigeodesics, coarse differentiation, height-respecting tetrahedra, and precise box tilings with horospherical measures—the authors show that any quasi-isometry $\Phi:X\bowtie Y\to X'\bowtie Y'$ is uniformly close to a product map $\left(\Phi^X,\Phi^Y\right)$ (up to permutation of factors). They introduce horo-admissible measures $(X,a,\mu^X)$ and $(Y,b,\mu^Y)$ and a derived measure $\mu$ on $X\bowtie Y$, along with a height-respecting projection framework, to derive quasi-isometry invariants such as $\frac{m}{n}$ and, in the solvable Lie group setting, a complete quasi-isometry classification for Carnot–Sol type groups. The results extend Eskin–Fisher–Whyte’s rigidity to a broad class of horospherical products, enabling new quasi-isometric classifications of solvable Lie groups and a detailed picture of the quasi-isometry group in these geometries.

Abstract

We prove that quasi-isometries of horospherical products of hyperbolic spaces are geometrically rigid in the sense that they are uniformly close to product maps, this is a generalisation of the result obtained by Eskin, Fisher and Whyte in [7]. Our work covers the case of solvable Lie groups of the form R ___ (N 1 x N 2), where N 1 and N 2 are nilpotent Lie groups, and where the action on R contracts the metric on N 1 while extending it on N 2. We obtain new quasi-isometric invariants and classi cations for these spaces.

Geometric rigidity of quasi-isometries in horospherical products

TL;DR

This work proves geometric rigidity for quasi-isometries between horospherical products of Gromov hyperbolic, Busemann spaces under the condition (and similarly for the primed pair). By developing a robust toolkit—ε-monotone quasigeodesics, coarse differentiation, height-respecting tetrahedra, and precise box tilings with horospherical measures—the authors show that any quasi-isometry is uniformly close to a product map (up to permutation of factors). They introduce horo-admissible measures and and a derived measure on , along with a height-respecting projection framework, to derive quasi-isometry invariants such as and, in the solvable Lie group setting, a complete quasi-isometry classification for Carnot–Sol type groups. The results extend Eskin–Fisher–Whyte’s rigidity to a broad class of horospherical products, enabling new quasi-isometric classifications of solvable Lie groups and a detailed picture of the quasi-isometry group in these geometries.

Abstract

We prove that quasi-isometries of horospherical products of hyperbolic spaces are geometrically rigid in the sense that they are uniformly close to product maps, this is a generalisation of the result obtained by Eskin, Fisher and Whyte in [7]. Our work covers the case of solvable Lie groups of the form R ___ (N 1 x N 2), where N 1 and N 2 are nilpotent Lie groups, and where the action on R contracts the metric on N 1 while extending it on N 2. We obtain new quasi-isometric invariants and classi cations for these spaces.
Paper Structure (30 sections, 69 theorems, 403 equations, 18 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 30 sections, 69 theorems, 403 equations, 18 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $X$, $X'$, $Y$ and $Y'$ be horo-pointed admissible measured metric spaces with $m> n$ and $m'>n'$ and let $\Phi:X\bowtie Y\to X'\bowtie Y'$ be a quasi-isometry. Then there exist two quasi-isometries $\Phi^X:X\to X'$ and $\Phi^Y:Y\to Y'$ such that:

Figures (18)

  • Figure 1: Horospherical product $X\bowtie Y$.
  • Figure 2: Small neighbourhood in $T_3\bowtie T_3$.
  • Figure 3: Figure of Lemma \ref{['CoroBackward']}.
  • Figure 4: Projection of $A$ on $X_z$.
  • Figure 5: Proof of Lemma \ref{['LemmaDisqueInShadow']}
  • ...and 13 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (146)

  • Theorem A: Geometric rigidity
  • Theorem B
  • Theorem C
  • Conjecture 1
  • Proposition D
  • Theorem E
  • Example 1.1
  • Lemma 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Lemma 1.5: Lemma 4.3 of TF
  • ...and 136 more