Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Disordered arcs and Harer stability

Oscar Harr, Max Vistrup, Nathalie Wahl

TL;DR

We address homological stability for mapping class groups $\Gamma(S_{g,r}^s)$ by embedding disk stabilization into the monoidal category ${\mathbf M}_2$ of bidecorated surfaces and using Euler characteristic as a grading. The main method combines a Yang–Baxter operator with Krannich stability theory to obtain the best known ranges $i \le \frac{2g}{3}$ for isomorphisms (and related bounds for two stabilization maps) and twisted-stability for coefficient systems of degree $k$. The work also clarifies that full braiding is not required: the inverse Dehn twist $T^{-1}$ yields a braid group action that suffices for stability, while not arising from a braiding on the subcategory. These results unify previous proofs and provide a flexible framework for homological stability in nonbraided settings.

Abstract

We give a new proof of homological stability with the best known isomorphism range for mapping class groups of surfaces with respect to genus. The proof uses the framework of Randal-Williams-Wahl and Krannich applied to disk stabilization in the category of bidecorated surfaces, using the Euler characteristic instead of the genus as a grading. The monoidal category of bidecorated surfaces does not admit a braiding, distinguishing it from previously known settings for homological stability. Nevertheless, we find that it admits a suitable Yang-Baxter element, which we show is sufficient structure for homological stability arguments.

Disordered arcs and Harer stability

TL;DR

We address homological stability for mapping class groups by embedding disk stabilization into the monoidal category of bidecorated surfaces and using Euler characteristic as a grading. The main method combines a Yang–Baxter operator with Krannich stability theory to obtain the best known ranges for isomorphisms (and related bounds for two stabilization maps) and twisted-stability for coefficient systems of degree . The work also clarifies that full braiding is not required: the inverse Dehn twist yields a braid group action that suffices for stability, while not arising from a braiding on the subcategory. These results unify previous proofs and provide a flexible framework for homological stability in nonbraided settings.

Abstract

We give a new proof of homological stability with the best known isomorphism range for mapping class groups of surfaces with respect to genus. The proof uses the framework of Randal-Williams-Wahl and Krannich applied to disk stabilization in the category of bidecorated surfaces, using the Euler characteristic instead of the genus as a grading. The monoidal category of bidecorated surfaces does not admit a braiding, distinguishing it from previously known settings for homological stability. Nevertheless, we find that it admits a suitable Yang-Baxter element, which we show is sufficient structure for homological stability arguments.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 16 theorems, 85 equations, 9 figures)

This paper contains 15 sections, 16 theorems, 85 equations, 9 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $S_{g,b}^s$ be a surface of genus $g\ge 0$, with $r\ge 1$ marked boundary components and $s\ge 0$ punctures, and let $\Gamma(S_{g,r}^s)=\pi_0{\operatorname{Homeo}} (S_{g,r}^s\textrm{ rel }\partial S)$ denote its mapping class group. The map induced by gluing a pair or pants along one boundary component is always injective, and an isomorphism when $i\leq\frac{2g}{3}$, and the map induced by g

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Maximal regular bad simplex $\{a_0,\dots,a_p\}$ and simplex $\{a'_0,\dots,a'_q\}$ in its link.
  • Figure 2: Regular bad 1-simplex with $\nu=1$.
  • Figure 3: Gluing a disk $X_1 = D^2$ to a bidecorated surface $S$
  • Figure 4: The curve $a_i$ in $D_i\mathbin{\text{\normalfont \#}} D_{i+1}$
  • Figure 5: Intersection of $a_i$ (blue) and $a_{i+1}$ (green) in the underlying surface of $D_i\mathbin{\text{\normalfont \#}} D_{i+1}\mathbin{\text{\normalfont \#}} D_{i+2}$.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (47)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem 3
  • Remark 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • ...and 37 more