Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale
Federico Bianchi, Pratyusha Kalluri, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Myra Cheng, Debora Nozza, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Dan Jurafsky, James Zou, Aylin Caliskan
TL;DR
This work reveals that publicly available text-to-image systems encode and propagate broad social stereotypes across identities, occupations, and everyday objects. Using Stable Diffusion as a primary case, it combines qualitative exemplars with CLIP-based analyses to show stereotype amplification even with neutral prompts, and demonstrates persistent biases despite mitigation efforts and guardrails as seen in DALL·E. The findings highlight the mass-distribution risks of stereotype-laden imagery, tying technical biases to social harms and emphasizing the need for ongoing, multidisciplinary mitigation and governance beyond prompt engineering. The study calls for careful consideration of deployment contexts and long-term strategies to curb the societal harms of language-vision models.
Abstract
Machine learning models that convert user-written text descriptions into images are now widely available online and used by millions of users to generate millions of images a day. We investigate the potential for these models to amplify dangerous and complex stereotypes. We find a broad range of ordinary prompts produce stereotypes, including prompts simply mentioning traits, descriptors, occupations, or objects. For example, we find cases of prompting for basic traits or social roles resulting in images reinforcing whiteness as ideal, prompting for occupations resulting in amplification of racial and gender disparities, and prompting for objects resulting in reification of American norms. Stereotypes are present regardless of whether prompts explicitly mention identity and demographic language or avoid such language. Moreover, stereotypes persist despite mitigation strategies; neither user attempts to counter stereotypes by requesting images with specific counter-stereotypes nor institutional attempts to add system ``guardrails'' have prevented the perpetuation of stereotypes. Our analysis justifies concerns regarding the impacts of today's models, presenting striking exemplars, and connecting these findings with deep insights into harms drawn from social scientific and humanist disciplines. This work contributes to the effort to shed light on the uniquely complex biases in language-vision models and demonstrates the ways that the mass deployment of text-to-image generation models results in mass dissemination of stereotypes and resulting harms.
