Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multicolor Ramsey Number for Double Stars

Jake Ruotolo, Zi-Xia Song

Abstract

For a graph $H$ and an integer $k\ge1$, let $r(H;k)$ and $r_\ell(H;k)$ denote the $k$-color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of $H$, respectively. Alon, Bucić, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szabó in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that $ r(K_{1,n};k)$ and $r_\ell(K_{1,n};k)$ are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the $k$-color Ramsey number for double stars $S(n,m)$, where $n\ge m\ge1$. To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of $r(S(n,m);k)$ when $k\ge3$. A classic result of Erdős and Graham from 1975 asserts that $r(T;k)>k(n-1)+1$ for every tree $T$ with $n\ge 1$ edges and $k$ sufficiently large such that $n$ divides $k-1$. Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if $k$ is odd and $n$ is sufficiently large compared with $m$ and $k$, then \[ r(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2.\] This is a step in our effort to determine whether $r(S(n,m);k)$ and $r_\ell(S(n,m);k)$ are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that $ r(S^m_n;k)=k(n-1)+m+2$ if $k $ is odd and $n$ is sufficiently large compared with $m$ and $k$, where $1\le m\le n$ and $S^m_n$ is obtained from $K_{1, n}$ by subdividing $m$ edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for $S(n,m)$ and $S^m_n$.

Multicolor Ramsey Number for Double Stars

Abstract

For a graph and an integer , let and denote the -color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of , respectively. Alon, Bucić, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szabó in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that and are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the -color Ramsey number for double stars , where . To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of when . A classic result of Erdős and Graham from 1975 asserts that for every tree with edges and sufficiently large such that divides . Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if is odd and is sufficiently large compared with and , then This is a step in our effort to determine whether and are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that if is odd and is sufficiently large compared with and , where and is obtained from by subdividing edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for and .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 28 theorems, 24 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 28 theorems, 24 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For all $k\ge2$ and $n\ge 1$,

Theorems & Definitions (39)

  • Theorem 1.1: Burr and Roberts BR73
  • Theorem 1.2: Irving Irv74
  • Theorem 1.3: Grossman, Harary and Klawe GHK79
  • Theorem 1.4: Norin, Sun and Zhao NSZ16
  • Proposition 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2: Petersen Petersen
  • ...and 29 more