Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Fine multibubble analysis in the higher-dimensional Brezis-Nirenberg problem

Tobias König, Paul Laurain

TL;DR

The paper analyzes blow-up phenomena for a higher-dimensional Brezis–Nirenberg-type equation with a negative perturbation V on a bounded domain. It develops a comprehensive multi-bubble framework: solutions concentrating at finitely many points with bubbles modeled by Aubin–Talenti profiles, governed by a Green-function–based interaction matrix M and a Robin function φ. By deriving sharp a priori bounds for remainders and precise energy expansions, the authors reduce the problem to a finite-dimensional variational system for a reduced energy F(κ,x) (and its N=4 analogue), yielding existence, location, and speeds of concentration points, and characterizing degenerate cases where improved rates occur. The results extend the blow-up analysis to N≥4, complementing previous work in N=3, and provide a detailed description of the complete blow-up picture in the Brezis–Nirenberg setting.

Abstract

For a bounded set $Ω\subset \mathbb R^N$ and a perturbation $V \in C^1(\overlineΩ)$, we analyze the concentration behavior of a blow-up sequence of positive solutions to \[ -Δu_ε+ εV = N(N-2) u_ε^\frac{N+2}{N-2} \] for dimensions $N \geq 4$, which are non-critical in the sense of the Brezis--Nirenberg problem. For the general case of multiple concentration points, we prove that concentration points are isolated and characterize the vector of these points as a critical point of a suitable function derived from the Green's function of $-Δ$ on $Ω$. Moreover, we give the leading order expression of the concentration speed. This paper, with a recent one by the authors (arXiv:2208.12337) in dimension $N = 3$, gives a complete picture of blow-up phenomena in the Brezis-Nirenberg framework.

Fine multibubble analysis in the higher-dimensional Brezis-Nirenberg problem

TL;DR

The paper analyzes blow-up phenomena for a higher-dimensional Brezis–Nirenberg-type equation with a negative perturbation V on a bounded domain. It develops a comprehensive multi-bubble framework: solutions concentrating at finitely many points with bubbles modeled by Aubin–Talenti profiles, governed by a Green-function–based interaction matrix M and a Robin function φ. By deriving sharp a priori bounds for remainders and precise energy expansions, the authors reduce the problem to a finite-dimensional variational system for a reduced energy F(κ,x) (and its N=4 analogue), yielding existence, location, and speeds of concentration points, and characterizing degenerate cases where improved rates occur. The results extend the blow-up analysis to N≥4, complementing previous work in N=3, and provide a detailed description of the complete blow-up picture in the Brezis–Nirenberg setting.

Abstract

For a bounded set and a perturbation , we analyze the concentration behavior of a blow-up sequence of positive solutions to for dimensions , which are non-critical in the sense of the Brezis--Nirenberg problem. For the general case of multiple concentration points, we prove that concentration points are isolated and characterize the vector of these points as a critical point of a suitable function derived from the Green's function of on . Moreover, we give the leading order expression of the concentration speed. This paper, with a recent one by the authors (arXiv:2208.12337) in dimension , gives a complete picture of blow-up phenomena in the Brezis-Nirenberg framework.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 19 theorems, 327 equations)

This paper contains 16 sections, 19 theorems, 327 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $(u_\varepsilon)$ be a sequence of solutions to brezis peletier additive, with $V \in C^1(\overline{\Omega})$ and $V < 0$ on $\overline{\Omega}$, such that $\|u_\varepsilon\|_\infty \to \infty$. Then there exists $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $n$ sequences of points $x_{1,\varepsilon},...,x_{n,\varepsi

Theorems & Definitions (40)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.6
  • ...and 30 more