Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Line Operators in 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Cherkis Bows

Nafiz Ishtiaque, Yehao Zhou

Abstract

We show that the phase spaces of a large family of line operators in 4d Chern-Simons theory with $\text{GL}_n$ gauge group are given by Cherkis bow varieties with $n$ crosses. These line operators are characterized by Hanany-Witten type brane constructions involving D3, D5, and NS5 branes in an $Ω$-background. Linking numbers of the five-branes and mass parameters for the D3 brane theories determine the phase spaces and in special cases they correspond to vacuum moduli spaces of 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ quiver theories. Examples include line operators that conjecturally create T, Q, and L-operators in integrable spin chains.

Line Operators in 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Cherkis Bows

Abstract

We show that the phase spaces of a large family of line operators in 4d Chern-Simons theory with gauge group are given by Cherkis bow varieties with crosses. These line operators are characterized by Hanany-Witten type brane constructions involving D3, D5, and NS5 branes in an -background. Linking numbers of the five-branes and mass parameters for the D3 brane theories determine the phase spaces and in special cases they correspond to vacuum moduli spaces of 3d quiver theories. Examples include line operators that conjecturally create T, Q, and L-operators in integrable spin chains.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 2 theorems, 152 equations, 17 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 27 sections, 2 theorems, 152 equations, 17 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 5.1

The T-operator, i.e., $\mathbb{L}_{\bm\varrho}^z(\bm K, \bm L)$ for $\bm K$ and $\bm L$ given by (TKL) carries a $\mathfrak{gl}_n$ Verma module. Up to the action of the Weyl group, the Verma module has the highest weight $\lambda - \rho$. The weight $\lambda$ is determined by its Dynkin labels $(\va

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Brane configuration for the line operator $\mathbb{L}_{\bm\varrho}(\bm K, \bm L)$ in $\text{GL}_n$ 4d CS theory labeled by linking numbers $\bm K=(K_1, \cdots, K_n)$ and $\bm L=(L_1, \cdots, L_p)$ satisfying $\sum_{i=1}^n K_i = \sum_{j=1}^p L_j = N$. $\hbar\varrho = \hbar(\varrho_1^\mathbb{C}, \cdots, \varrho_{p-1}^\mathbb{C})$ are complex FI parameters, they are not visible in the classical brane picture. We denote the 3d ${\mathcal{N}}=4$ theory describing the low energy dynamics of the D3 branes by $T^\vee_{\bm\varrho}[\text{U}(N)]_{\bm K}^{\bm L}$.
  • Figure 2: A brane configuration found after applying some Hanany-Witten transitions to the configuration in Fig. \ref{['fig:LOKL']}, assuming the constraints (\ref{['cobalanced']}). The two brane configurations lead to the same IR description of the D3 brane world-volume theory in terms of the same 3d ${\mathcal{N}}=4$ gauge theory.
  • Figure 3: Quiver for the 3d ${\mathcal{N}}=4$ theory $T^\vee_{\bm\varrho}[\text{U}(N)]_{\bm K}^{\bm L}$ with $N = \sum_{i=1}^n K_i = \sum_{j=1}^p L_j$. The ranks of the gauge and flavor groups are defined form $\bm K$ and $\bm L$ via (\ref{['cobalanced']}). The complex FI parameter associated to the abelian factor of the $j$th gauge node is $\hbar\varrho_j^\mathbb{C}$ and $\bm\varrho = (\varrho_1^\mathbb{C}, \cdots, \varrho_{p-1}^\mathbb{C})$.
  • Figure 4: A generic D5 type boundary determined by $\bm K = (K_1, \cdots, K_n)$ and $K_i$ is the linking number of the $i$th D5 brane. We denote the total number of D3 branes by $N = \sum_{i=1}^n K_i$.
  • Figure 5: The bow diagram for the D5 type boundary whose brane diagram is given in Fig. \ref{['fig:D5boundary']}. Here $\bm K=(K_1, \cdots, K_n)$ is an $n$-tuple of integers satisfying (\ref{['NK']}).
  • ...and 12 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Remark 4.1: Further Comments on Twisted Masses
  • Proposition 5.1
  • Lemma 5.2
  • proof
  • Remark 5.3: Comparing the Higgs and Coulomb Branches
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['prop:Tweight']}
  • Remark 5.4: All the Q-operators from Bazhanov:2010jq