K3 surfaces with two involutions and low Picard number
Dino Festi, Wim Nijgh, Daniel Platt
TL;DR
The paper investigates K3 surfaces of degree $2d$ that possess commuting holomorphic and anti-holomorphic involutions, establishing minimal Picard numbers and constructing explicit examples with $ρ=2$ for $d=2,3,4$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. It combines three main constructions: double covers of the plane (degree-2 K3s), nodal quartics, and smooth quartics with carefully chosen Picard lattices, plus an analysis of real structures to realize Picard lattices over $\mathbb{R}$. A key outcome is the realization of a nodal-quartic pathway yielding infinitely many $d$-values with $ρ=2$, and a strengthening of Morrison’s theorem by showing every even lattice with rank up to 10 and signature $(1,r-1)$ can be realized by a real K3 with nonempty real locus. The results provide a broad supply of explicit, low-$ρ$ K3 examples suitable for applications in hyperkähler and $G_2$-geometry constructions, including explicit models over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ and multiple polarizations of degree 2 and 8.
Abstract
Let $X$ be a complex algebraic K3 surface of degree $2d$ and with Picard number $ρ$. Assume that $X$ admits two commuting involutions: one holomorphic and one anti-holomorphic. In that case, $ρ\geq 1$ when $d=1$ and $ρ\geq 2$ when $d \geq 2$. For $d=1$, the first example defined over $\mathbb{Q}$ with $ρ=1$ was produced already in 2008 by Elsenhans and Jahnel. A K3 surface provided by Kondō, also defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, can be used to realise the minimum $ρ=2$ for all $d\geq 2$. In these notes we construct new explicit examples of K3 surfaces over the rational numbers realising the minimum $ρ=2$ for $d=2,3,4$. We also show that a nodal quartic surface can be used to realise the minimum $ρ=2$ for infinitely many different values of $d$. Finally, we strengthen a result of Morrison by showing that for any even lattice $N$ of rank $1\leq r \leq 10$ and signature $(1,r-1)$ there exists a K3 surface $Y$ defined over $\mathbb{R}$ such that $\textrm{Pic} Y_\mathbb{C}=\textrm{Pic} Y \cong N$.
