Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Event Learning and Gentle Random Measurements

Adam Bene Watts, John Bostanci

TL;DR

It is proved the expected disturbance caused to a quantum system by a sequence of randomly ordered two-outcome projective measurements is upper bounded by the square root of the probability that at least one measurement in the sequence accepts.

Abstract

We prove the expected disturbance caused to a quantum system by a sequence of randomly ordered two-outcome projective measurements is upper bounded by the square root of the probability that at least one measurement in the sequence accepts. We call this bound the Gentle Random Measurement Lemma. We then consider problems in which we are given sample access to an unknown state $ρ$ and asked to estimate properties of the accepting probabilities $\text{Tr}[M_i ρ]$ of a set of measurements $\{M_1, M_2, \ldots , M_m\}$. We call these types of problems Quantum Event Learning Problems. Using the gentle random measurement lemma, we show randomly ordering projective measurements solves the Quantum OR problem, answering an open question of Aaronson. We also give a Quantum OR protocol which works on non-projective measurements but which requires a more complicated type of measurement, which we call a Blended Measurement. Given additional guarantees on the set of measurements $\{M_1, \ldots, M_m\}$, we show the Quantum OR protocols developed in this paper can also be used to find a measurement $M_i$ such that $\text{Tr}[M_i ρ]$ is large. We also give a blended measurement based protocol for estimating the average accepting probability of a set of measurements on an unknown state. Finally we consider the Threshold Search Problem described by O'Donnell and Bădescu. By building on our Quantum Event Finding result we show that randomly ordered (or blended) measurements can be used to solve this problem using $O(\log^2(m) / ε^2)$ copies of $ρ$. Consequently, we obtain an algorithm for Shadow Tomography which requires $\tilde{O}(\log^2(m)\log(d)/ε^4)$ samples, matching the current best known sample complexity. This algorithm does not require injected noise in the quantum measurements, but does require measurements to be made in a random order and so is no longer online.

Quantum Event Learning and Gentle Random Measurements

TL;DR

It is proved the expected disturbance caused to a quantum system by a sequence of randomly ordered two-outcome projective measurements is upper bounded by the square root of the probability that at least one measurement in the sequence accepts.

Abstract

We prove the expected disturbance caused to a quantum system by a sequence of randomly ordered two-outcome projective measurements is upper bounded by the square root of the probability that at least one measurement in the sequence accepts. We call this bound the Gentle Random Measurement Lemma. We then consider problems in which we are given sample access to an unknown state and asked to estimate properties of the accepting probabilities of a set of measurements . We call these types of problems Quantum Event Learning Problems. Using the gentle random measurement lemma, we show randomly ordering projective measurements solves the Quantum OR problem, answering an open question of Aaronson. We also give a Quantum OR protocol which works on non-projective measurements but which requires a more complicated type of measurement, which we call a Blended Measurement. Given additional guarantees on the set of measurements , we show the Quantum OR protocols developed in this paper can also be used to find a measurement such that is large. We also give a blended measurement based protocol for estimating the average accepting probability of a set of measurements on an unknown state. Finally we consider the Threshold Search Problem described by O'Donnell and Bădescu. By building on our Quantum Event Finding result we show that randomly ordered (or blended) measurements can be used to solve this problem using copies of . Consequently, we obtain an algorithm for Shadow Tomography which requires samples, matching the current best known sample complexity. This algorithm does not require injected noise in the quantum measurements, but does require measurements to be made in a random order and so is no longer online.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 41 theorems, 160 equations, 5 algorithms)

This paper contains 21 sections, 41 theorems, 160 equations, 5 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $\rho$ be a quantum state, $M$ be a two-outcome measurement and $\rho'$ be the post measurement state when the reject outcome is observed. Then

Theorems & Definitions (94)

  • Lemma : Gentle Measurement Lemma, informal
  • Lemma : Gentle Sequential Measurement, informal
  • Theorem 1: Gentle Random Measurement Lemma
  • Theorem 2: Random Measurements Solve Quantum OR
  • Theorem 3: Improved Quantum Or Procedure
  • Theorem 4: Single Copy Event Finding
  • Theorem 5: Random Measurements Solve Event Finding
  • Theorem 6: Random Measurement Threshold Search
  • Lemma 7: Gentle Measurement Lemma
  • Lemma 8
  • ...and 84 more