The Open-World Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for OOD Intent Classification
Yunhua Zhou, Pengyu Wang, Peiju Liu, Yuxin Wang, Xipeng Qiu
TL;DR
The paper addresses the challenge of out-of-domain (OOD) intent classification by identifying overparameterization as a driver of overconfidence and proposing calibrated subnetworks obtained via pruning. It introduces the Open-world Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (OLT), which finds a winning subnetwork through one-shot magnitude pruning that preserves in-domain (IND) accuracy while improving OOD detection, aided by temperature scaling. Empirical results on four real-world datasets show consistent improvements over strong baselines and demonstrate compatibility with multiple OOD scoring functions, highlighting the practical impact of principled calibration. The work offers a principled, scalable path to robust open-world intent understanding and lays groundwork for extending calibrated lottery tickets to other architectures and modalities, including potential applications beyond discriminative models.
Abstract
Most existing methods of Out-of-Domain (OOD) intent classification rely on extensive auxiliary OOD corpora or specific training paradigms. However, they are underdeveloped in the underlying principle that the models should have differentiated confidence in In- and Out-of-domain intent. In this work, we shed light on the fundamental cause of model overconfidence on OOD and demonstrate that calibrated subnetworks can be uncovered by pruning the overparameterized model. Calibrated confidence provided by the subnetwork can better distinguish In- and Out-of-domain, which can be a benefit for almost all post hoc methods. In addition to bringing fundamental insights, we also extend the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to open-world scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments on four real-world datasets to demonstrate our approach can establish consistent improvements compared with a suite of competitive baselines.
