Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the hull and interval numbers of oriented graphs

J. Araujo, A. K. Maia, P. P. Medeiros, L. Penso

Abstract

In this work, for a given oriented graph $D$, we study its interval and hull numbers, respectively, in the oriented geodetic, P3 and P3* convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph D, and the oriented geodetic convexity, we prove that $ohng(D)\leq m(D)-n(D)+2$ and that there is at least one such that $ohng(D) = m(D)-n(D)$. We also determine exact values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allow us to deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute $ohnp(D)$ when the underlying graph of $D$ is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether $oing(D)\leq k$ or $ohng(D)\leq k$ is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by $k$, for some $i\in\mathbb{Z_+^*}$, then the same holds even if the underlying graph of $D$ is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether $ohnp(D)\leq k$ or $ohnps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic and its underlying graph is bipartite; that deciding whether $ohng(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic; that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is NP-complete, even if $D$ has no directed cycles and the underlying graph of $D$ is a chordal bipartite graph; and that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if the underlying graph of $D$ is split. Finally, also argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented P3 and P3* convexities can be computed in cubic time for graphs of bounded clique-width by using Courcelle's theorem.

On the hull and interval numbers of oriented graphs

Abstract

In this work, for a given oriented graph , we study its interval and hull numbers, respectively, in the oriented geodetic, P3 and P3* convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph D, and the oriented geodetic convexity, we prove that and that there is at least one such that . We also determine exact values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allow us to deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute when the underlying graph of is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether or is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by , for some , then the same holds even if the underlying graph of is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether or is W[2]-hard parameterized by , even if is acyclic and its underlying graph is bipartite; that deciding whether is W[2]-hard parameterized by , even if is acyclic; that deciding whether or is NP-complete, even if has no directed cycles and the underlying graph of is a chordal bipartite graph; and that deciding whether or is W[2]-hard parameterized by , even if the underlying graph of is split. Finally, also argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented P3 and P3* convexities can be computed in cubic time for graphs of bounded clique-width by using Courcelle's theorem.
Paper Structure (35 sections, 29 theorems, 14 equations, 2 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 35 sections, 29 theorems, 14 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $D$ be an oriented graph and let $\mathop{\mathrm{\cal X}}\nolimits \in \{\mathop{\mathrm{\overrightarrow{g}}}\nolimits,\mathop{\mathrm{\overrightarrow{P_3}}}\nolimits, \mathop{\mathrm{\overrightarrow{P_3^*}}}\nolimits\}$. If $S\neq \emptyset$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{\cal X}}\nolimits$-coconvex, the

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Gadget for $u_i \in U$.
  • Figure 2: Gadget for $u_i\in U$.

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Corollary 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Proposition 5
  • Proposition 6
  • Corollary 7
  • Proposition 8
  • Proposition 9
  • Proposition 10: HW1996
  • ...and 22 more