Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantitative Algebras and a Classification of Metric Monads

J. Adámek, M. Dostál, J. Velebil

TL;DR

The paper establishes a deep correspondence between classes of quantitative algebras (varieties) and monads on metric categories, identifying strongly finitary (and λ-ary) monads with the free-algebra monads of appropriate varieties. It develops enriched Kan-extension and foliation techniques to prove these equivalences for both $\,\mathsf{UMet}$ and $\,\mathsf{Met}$ (under compositionality assumptions), and extends the theory to complete ultrametric spaces and generalized/λ-basic settings. The work unifies finite and infinitary, as well as ultrametric and metric, frameworks, providing a Dubuc-style bridge between algebraic theories and monadic semantics in enriched metric contexts. It also clarifies the limits of ω-ary results and outlines a generalized, λ-parameterized landscape for presentable theories in metric categories.

Abstract

Quantitative algebras are $Σ$-algebras acting on metric spaces, where operations are nonexpanding. Mardare, Panangaden and Plotkin introduced 1-basic varieties as categories of quantitative algebras presented by quantitative equations. We prove that for the category $\mathsf{UMet}$ of ultrametric spaces such varieties bijectively correspond to strongly finitary monads on $\mathsf{UMet}$. The same holds for the category $\mathsf{Met}$ of metric spaces, provided that strongly finitary endofunctors are closed under composition. For uncountable cardinals $λ$ there is an analogous bijection between varieties of $λ$-ary quantitative algebras and monads that are strongly $λ$-accessible. Moreover, we present a bijective correspondence between $λ$-basic varieties as introduced by Mardare et al and enriched, surjections-preserving $λ$-accesible monads on $\mathsf{Met}$. Finally, for general enriched $λ$-accessible monads on $\mathsf{Met}$ a bijective correspondence to generalized varieties is presented.

Quantitative Algebras and a Classification of Metric Monads

TL;DR

The paper establishes a deep correspondence between classes of quantitative algebras (varieties) and monads on metric categories, identifying strongly finitary (and λ-ary) monads with the free-algebra monads of appropriate varieties. It develops enriched Kan-extension and foliation techniques to prove these equivalences for both and (under compositionality assumptions), and extends the theory to complete ultrametric spaces and generalized/λ-basic settings. The work unifies finite and infinitary, as well as ultrametric and metric, frameworks, providing a Dubuc-style bridge between algebraic theories and monadic semantics in enriched metric contexts. It also clarifies the limits of ω-ary results and outlines a generalized, λ-parameterized landscape for presentable theories in metric categories.

Abstract

Quantitative algebras are -algebras acting on metric spaces, where operations are nonexpanding. Mardare, Panangaden and Plotkin introduced 1-basic varieties as categories of quantitative algebras presented by quantitative equations. We prove that for the category of ultrametric spaces such varieties bijectively correspond to strongly finitary monads on . The same holds for the category of metric spaces, provided that strongly finitary endofunctors are closed under composition. For uncountable cardinals there is an analogous bijection between varieties of -ary quantitative algebras and monads that are strongly -accessible. Moreover, we present a bijective correspondence between -basic varieties as introduced by Mardare et al and enriched, surjections-preserving -accesible monads on . Finally, for general enriched -accessible monads on a bijective correspondence to generalized varieties is presented.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 61 theorems, 61 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 9 sections, 61 theorems, 61 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 2.5

The category $\mathsf{Met}$ is complete and cocomplete.

Figures (1)

  • Figure : A Classification of Monads on $\mathsf{UMet}$ (for $\lambda \geq \aleph_1$)

Theorems & Definitions (150)

  • Remark 2.2: Peter Johnstone, private communication
  • Remark 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5: adamek+rosicky:approximate-injectivity, Theorem 4.6
  • Example 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Corollary 2.8
  • Proposition 2.9
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.10
  • Remark 2.11
  • ...and 140 more