Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Dirac inequality for highest weight Harish-Chandra modules I

Pavle Pandžić, Ana Prlić, Vladimír Souček, Vít Tuček

TL;DR

The paper develops a direct Dirac-inequality approach to the unitarity problem for highest weight Harish-Chandra modules over classical Hermitian-type groups. By formulating explicit Dirac inequalities for each reductive case through Schmid modules and generalized PRV components, it translates unitarity into concrete weight-bounds on the highest weights $oldsymbol{rac{}}$, and uses these to characterize when the generalized Verma module $N(oldsymbol{rac{}})$ is irreducible and when its irreducible quotient $L(oldsymbol{rac{}})$ is unitarizable. The work provides case-by-case criteria for $ rak{sp}(2n,b{R})$, $ rak{so}^*(2n)$, $ rak{su}(p,q)$, $ rak{so}(2,2n-2)$, and $ rak{so}(2,2n-1)$, setting up a more direct path to the EHW classification and paving the way for the sequel PPST2 to complete the program. The methods also hint at applications to convergence and analysis of $K$-type decompositions in these unitary representations.

Abstract

Let $G$ be a connected simply connected noncompact classical simple Lie group of Hermitian type. Then $G$ has unitary highest weight representations. The proof of the classification of unitary highest weight representations of $G$ given by Enright, Howe and Wallach is based on the Dirac inequality of Parthasarathy, Jantzen's formula and Howe's theory of dual pairs where one group in the pair is compact. In this paper we focus on the Dirac inequality which can be used to prove the classification in a more direct way.

Dirac inequality for highest weight Harish-Chandra modules I

TL;DR

The paper develops a direct Dirac-inequality approach to the unitarity problem for highest weight Harish-Chandra modules over classical Hermitian-type groups. By formulating explicit Dirac inequalities for each reductive case through Schmid modules and generalized PRV components, it translates unitarity into concrete weight-bounds on the highest weights , and uses these to characterize when the generalized Verma module is irreducible and when its irreducible quotient is unitarizable. The work provides case-by-case criteria for , , , , and , setting up a more direct path to the EHW classification and paving the way for the sequel PPST2 to complete the program. The methods also hint at applications to convergence and analysis of -type decompositions in these unitary representations.

Abstract

Let be a connected simply connected noncompact classical simple Lie group of Hermitian type. Then has unitary highest weight representations. The proof of the classification of unitary highest weight representations of given by Enright, Howe and Wallach is based on the Dirac inequality of Parthasarathy, Jantzen's formula and Howe's theory of dual pairs where one group in the pair is compact. In this paper we focus on the Dirac inequality which can be used to prove the classification in a more direct way.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 17 theorems, 217 equations, 2 tables)

This paper contains 8 sections, 17 theorems, 217 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let us assume that $\mathfrak{g}, \rho, \lambda, s$ are as in tables tab:table1 and tab: table2. (1) Let $s_0$ be a Schmid module such that the strict Dirac inequality holds for any Schmid module $s$ of strictly lower level than $s_0$, and such that Then $L(\lambda)$ is not unitary. (2) If holds for all Schmid modules $s$, then $N(\lambda)$ is irreducible and unitary.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.6
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.23
  • Theorem 3.31
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.47
  • ...and 20 more