Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Structures in HOMFLY-PT homology

Alex Chandler, Eugene Gorsky

TL;DR

This work analyzes the structure of triply graded HOMFLY-PT (KR) homology using data from NS and the $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ action to extract the $S$-invariant and relate it to $\mathfrak{sl}(N)$ invariants. It develops a Delta-grading visualization, studies Rasmussen spectral sequences and their differentials $d_N$, and introduces $d_{a|b}$ and a comprehensive $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-module framework, including $y$-ification, to organize and interpret the data. The paper proves that for knots in the NS dataset the HOMFLY-PT $S$-invariant is determined by $\mathcal{H}(K)$ and clarifies the relation between $\mathcal{H}(K)$ and $H_{\frak{sl}(N)}(K)$, often yielding a collapse or regrading equivalence for $N\ge 3$, with explicit computations for examples like $10_{125}$, $11n_{135}$, and $T(4,5)$. These results provide a practical route to derive slice-genus bounds and coherence between triply graded and $\frak{sl}(N)$ knot invariants, advancing computational and conceptual understanding of knot concordance through HOMFLY-PT homology.

Abstract

We study the structure of triply graded Khovanov-Rozansky homology using both the data recently computed by Nakagane and Sano for knots up to 11 crossings, and the $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ action defined by the second author, Hogancamp and Mellit. In particular, we compute the HOMFLY-PT $S$-invariant for all knots in the dataset, and compare it to the $\mathfrak{sl}(N)$ concordance invariants.

Structures in HOMFLY-PT homology

TL;DR

This work analyzes the structure of triply graded HOMFLY-PT (KR) homology using data from NS and the action to extract the -invariant and relate it to invariants. It develops a Delta-grading visualization, studies Rasmussen spectral sequences and their differentials , and introduces and a comprehensive -module framework, including -ification, to organize and interpret the data. The paper proves that for knots in the NS dataset the HOMFLY-PT -invariant is determined by and clarifies the relation between and , often yielding a collapse or regrading equivalence for , with explicit computations for examples like , , and . These results provide a practical route to derive slice-genus bounds and coherence between triply graded and knot invariants, advancing computational and conceptual understanding of knot concordance through HOMFLY-PT homology.

Abstract

We study the structure of triply graded Khovanov-Rozansky homology using both the data recently computed by Nakagane and Sano for knots up to 11 crossings, and the action defined by the second author, Hogancamp and Mellit. In particular, we compute the HOMFLY-PT -invariant for all knots in the dataset, and compare it to the concordance invariants.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 35 theorems, 80 equations, 26 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 17 sections, 35 theorems, 80 equations, 26 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For all knots in the dataset, the $S$-invariant is determined by $\mathcal{H}(K)$.

Figures (26)

  • Figure 1: Triply graded homology of the knot $K=11n_{80}$. The $q$ and $a$ gradings are plotted, and $t$ is determined by either $q+a+t=-4$ or $q+a+t=-2$. The red circles indicate the homology of the differentials $d_1$ and $d_{-1}$, in particular, the HOMFLY-PT $S$-invariant equals 2.
  • Figure 2: Triply graded homology of the knot $K=11a_{85}$. Since $K$ is two-bridge, it follows that $K$ is thin. The $q$ and $a$ gradings are plotted, and $t$ is determined by $q+a+t=2$. The $S$-invariant equals $-2$.
  • Figure 3: Triply graded homology of the knot $K=11a_{263}$. This is the only alternating knot in the dataset which is not thin. The $S$-invariant equals $-8$.
  • Figure 4: Here we have both the triply graded homology and $\mathfrak{sl}(3)$ homology of the knot $K=9_{11}$. The $S$-invariant equals $4$ while the $\mathfrak{sl}(3)$ invariants are equal to $j_{x^3-x}=-8$, $s_{x^3-x}=\frac{j_{x^3-x}}{4}=-2$.
  • Figure 5: Triply graded homology of the knot $K=\textnormal{$9_{42}$}$. This is an example of a knot whose $S$ invariant, $0$, is not equal to the negative of its signature, $2$.
  • ...and 21 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (73)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: RasTwoBridge
  • Remark 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4: RasDiff
  • Remark 2.5
  • Corollary 2.6
  • ...and 63 more