Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Characterization of differential K-theory by hexagon diagram

Jiahao Hu

TL;DR

The paper proves that differential K-theory is uniquely determined by its character diagram up to a unique natural equivalence, by endowing the diagram with canonical topologies and showing a canonical hexagon for the central group $\hat{K}$. It develops universal classes and a Chern–Simons integration framework, and uses approximation by manifolds to transfer cohomological data to a strictly exact, topologically rigid setting. A key outcome is a rigidity result identifying $K^{-1}_{\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}}$ as the flat theory, complementing existing work and clarifying the role of torsion and identity components within differential K-theory. Overall, the methods adapt Bunke–Schick’s approach to a differential K-theory context, yielding a definitive axiomatisation and robust structural insights for differential refinements of generalized cohomology theories.

Abstract

Using a canonical topology on differential K-theory induced from the Frechét space topology on differential forms and the discrete topology on topological K-theory, we prove that differential K-theory is uniquely determined by the character diagram up to a unique natural equivalence, thus giving an affirmative answer to a question asked by Simons and Sullivan in \cite{SS10}. We further deduce rigidity results including that there is a unique way of realizing $\RR/\ZZ$-K-theory as the flat theory, strengthening the results of \cite{BS10}.

Characterization of differential K-theory by hexagon diagram

TL;DR

The paper proves that differential K-theory is uniquely determined by its character diagram up to a unique natural equivalence, by endowing the diagram with canonical topologies and showing a canonical hexagon for the central group . It develops universal classes and a Chern–Simons integration framework, and uses approximation by manifolds to transfer cohomological data to a strictly exact, topologically rigid setting. A key outcome is a rigidity result identifying as the flat theory, complementing existing work and clarifying the role of torsion and identity components within differential K-theory. Overall, the methods adapt Bunke–Schick’s approach to a differential K-theory context, yielding a definitive axiomatisation and robust structural insights for differential refinements of generalized cohomology theories.

Abstract

Using a canonical topology on differential K-theory induced from the Frechét space topology on differential forms and the discrete topology on topological K-theory, we prove that differential K-theory is uniquely determined by the character diagram up to a unique natural equivalence, thus giving an affirmative answer to a question asked by Simons and Sullivan in \cite{SS10}. We further deduce rigidity results including that there is a unique way of realizing -K-theory as the flat theory, strengthening the results of \cite{BS10}.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 30 theorems, 44 equations)

This paper contains 22 sections, 30 theorems, 44 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Any two differential K-functors $(\hat{K}',i',j',\delta',ch')$ and $(\hat{K},i,j,\delta,ch)$ are naturally equivalent via a natural transformation $\Phi:(\hat{K}',i',j',\delta',ch')\to (\hat{K},i,j,\delta,ch)$; such $\Phi$ is unique.

Theorems & Definitions (64)

  • Theorem 1.1: Uniqueness
  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Definition 2.4
  • Example 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 54 more