Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Characterizations and models for the $C_{1,r}$ class and quantum annulus

Sourav Pal, Nitin Tomar

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive dilation-based framework for the $C_{1,r}$ class and its quantum counterpart. By proving a model-cum-characterization of $C_{1,r}$ through a pair consisting of an $A_r$-unitary and a self-adjoint unitary, it reduces analysis to structured normal operators on a larger space and connects $C_{1,r}$ with the quantum annulus via a simple scaling equivalence. The authors then transfer the model to the quantum annulus, obtaining parallel characterizations in terms of normal operators with spectrum on the annulus boundary and spectral-set conditions. Collectively, the results unify these annulus-related operator classes under a common dilation paradigm and provide explicit operator-pair models for both $C_{1,r}$ and $\\mathbb{Q} \\mathbb{A}_r$.

Abstract

For fixed $0<r<1$, let $A_r=\{z \in \mathbb{C} : r<|z|<1\}$ be the annulus with boundary $\partial \overline{A}_r=\mathbb{T} \cup r\mathbb{T}$, where $\mathbb T$ is the unit circle in the complex plane $\mathbb C$. An operator having $\ov{A}_r$ as a spectral set is called an $A_r$-\textit{contraction}. Also, a normal operator with its spectrum lying in the boundary $\partial \overline{A}_r$ is called an \textit{$A_r$-unitary}. The \textit{$C_{1,r}$ class} was introduced by Bello and Yakubovich in the following way: \[ C_{1, r}=\{T: T \ \mbox{is invertible and} \ \|T\|, \|rT^{-1}\| \leq 1\}. \] McCullough and Pascoe defined the \textit{quantum annulus} $\mathbb Q \mathbb A_r$ by \[ \mathbb Q\mathbb A_r = \{T \,:\, T \text{ is invertible and } \, \|rT\|, \|rT^{-1}\| \leq 1 \}. \] If $\mathcal A_r$ denotes the set of all $A_r$-contractions, then $\mathcal A_r \subsetneq C_{1,r} \subsetneq \mathbb Q \mathbb A_r$. We first find a model for an operator in $C_{1,r}$ and also characterize the operators in $C_{1,r}$ in several different ways. We prove that the classes $C_{1,r}$ and $\mathbb Q\mathbb A_r$ are equivalent. Then, via this equivalence, we obtain analogous model and characterizations for an operator in $\mathbb Q \mathbb A_r$.

Characterizations and models for the $C_{1,r}$ class and quantum annulus

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive dilation-based framework for the class and its quantum counterpart. By proving a model-cum-characterization of through a pair consisting of an -unitary and a self-adjoint unitary, it reduces analysis to structured normal operators on a larger space and connects with the quantum annulus via a simple scaling equivalence. The authors then transfer the model to the quantum annulus, obtaining parallel characterizations in terms of normal operators with spectrum on the annulus boundary and spectral-set conditions. Collectively, the results unify these annulus-related operator classes under a common dilation paradigm and provide explicit operator-pair models for both and .

Abstract

For fixed , let be the annulus with boundary , where is the unit circle in the complex plane . An operator having as a spectral set is called an -\textit{contraction}. Also, a normal operator with its spectrum lying in the boundary is called an \textit{-unitary}. The \textit{ class} was introduced by Bello and Yakubovich in the following way: McCullough and Pascoe defined the \textit{quantum annulus} by If denotes the set of all -contractions, then . We first find a model for an operator in and also characterize the operators in in several different ways. We prove that the classes and are equivalent. Then, via this equivalence, we obtain analogous model and characterizations for an operator in .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 22 theorems, 53 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 22 theorems, 53 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

$\mathcal{A}_r \subsetneq C_\alpha \subsetneq C_{1, r}$ .

Theorems & Definitions (34)

  • Theorem 1.1: Dmitry, Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Pas-McCull, Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Lemma 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 2.1: Ando, Ando
  • Lemma 2.2
  • ...and 24 more