Gluck twists on concordant or homotopic spheres
Daniel Kasprowski, Mark Powell, Arunima Ray
TL;DR
This work analyzes Gluck twists along embedded $2$-spheres in compact $4$-manifolds, comparing the twisted manifolds $M_S$ and $M_T$ when the spheres are concordant or homotopic. It proves that concordant spheres yield an $s$-cobordism between $M_S$ and $M_T$, which implies homeomorphism under suitable fundamental-group hypotheses; and that homotopic spheres yield simple homotopy equivalence, with additional surgery-theoretic conditions ensuring homeomorphism. The paper also presents counterexamples showing the necessity of the hypotheses and constructs explicit fake or exotic $4$-manifolds arising from Gluck twists, including cases where twists produce homeomorphic yet non-diffeomorphic or non-stably-diffeomorphic manifolds. The results extend to the topological category and illuminate when Gluck twists preserve or alter topology versus smooth structure in $4$-manifolds, highlighting the intricate interplay between concordance, homotopy, and surgery theory.
Abstract
Let $M$ be a compact $4$-manifold and let $S$ and $T$ be embedded $2$-spheres in $M$, both with trivial normal bundle. We write $M_S$ and $M_T$ for the $4$-manifolds obtained by the Gluck twist operation on $M$ along $S$ and $T$ respectively. We show that if $S$ and $T$ are concordant, then $M_S$ and $M_T$ are $s$-cobordant, and so if $π_1(M)$ is good, then $M_S$ and $M_T$ are homeomorphic. Similarly, if $S$ and $T$ are homotopic then we show that $M_S$ and $M_T$ are simple homotopy equivalent. Under some further assumptions, we deduce that $M_S$ and $M_T$ are homeomorphic. We show that additional assumptions are necessary by giving an example where $S$ and $T$ are homotopic but $M_S$ and $M_T$ are not homeomorphic. We also give an example where $S$ and $T$ are homotopic and $M_S$ and $M_T$ are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic.
