Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimal Adjacency Labels for Subgraphs of Cartesian Products

Louis Esperet, Nathaniel Harms, Viktor Zamaraev

TL;DR

The paper develops optimal adjacency labeling schemes for subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs from a hereditary class $\mathcal{F}$, connecting product-closure labeling to the base class via $s(n)$-size schemes and information-theoretic limits. It introduces a three-phase framework: (1) exactly one-coordinate differences, (2) XOR-labeling to compose per-factor labels, and (3) minimal perfect hashing to account for edge deletions, yielding additive $O(\log n)$ overheads and, in the induced-subgraph case, $O(\delta(n))$ overheads. The main results show $\mathsf{her}(\mathcal{F}^\square)$ admits labeling size $2s(n)+O(\log n)$ and $\mathsf{mon}(\mathcal{F}^\square)$ admits $s(n)+O(\delta(n)+\log n)$, tight up to constants, with corollaries that efficient labeling transfers from $\mathcal{F}$ to its Cartesian-product closures. These findings refine the understanding of the implicit-graph conjecture in the Cartesian-product setting and provide explicit, efficient encoders/decoders by combining communication complexity, hashing, and additive-combinatorics techniques.

Abstract

For any hereditary graph class $F$, we construct optimal adjacency labeling schemes for the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in $F$. As a consequence, we show that, if $F$ admits efficient adjacency labels (or, equivalently, small induced-universal graphs) meeting the information-theoretic minimum, then the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in $F$ do too. Our proof uses ideas from randomized communication complexity, hashing, and additive combinatorics, and improves upon recent results of Chepoi, Labourel, and Ratel [Journal of Graph Theory, 2020].

Optimal Adjacency Labels for Subgraphs of Cartesian Products

TL;DR

The paper develops optimal adjacency labeling schemes for subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs from a hereditary class , connecting product-closure labeling to the base class via -size schemes and information-theoretic limits. It introduces a three-phase framework: (1) exactly one-coordinate differences, (2) XOR-labeling to compose per-factor labels, and (3) minimal perfect hashing to account for edge deletions, yielding additive overheads and, in the induced-subgraph case, overheads. The main results show admits labeling size and admits , tight up to constants, with corollaries that efficient labeling transfers from to its Cartesian-product closures. These findings refine the understanding of the implicit-graph conjecture in the Cartesian-product setting and provide explicit, efficient encoders/decoders by combining communication complexity, hashing, and additive-combinatorics techniques.

Abstract

For any hereditary graph class , we construct optimal adjacency labeling schemes for the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in . As a consequence, we show that, if admits efficient adjacency labels (or, equivalently, small induced-universal graphs) meeting the information-theoretic minimum, then the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in do too. Our proof uses ideas from randomized communication complexity, hashing, and additive combinatorics, and improves upon recent results of Chepoi, Labourel, and Ratel [Journal of Graph Theory, 2020].
Paper Structure (7 sections, 15 theorems, 10 equations)

This paper contains 7 sections, 15 theorems, 10 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a hereditary class with an adjacency labeling scheme of size $s(n)$. Then:

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1: Yao03HWZ21
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 15 more