Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Finite field models of Raleigh-Akiyama polynomials for Hecke groups

Barry Brent

Abstract

Following work of Raleigh and Akiyama (\cite{raleigh1962fourier, akiyama1992note}), in \cite{interpolating} we considered (among other objects) families of weight zero meromorphic modular forms $J_m$ for Hecke groups $G(λ_m)$. We conjectured in \cite{interpolating} that, for a certain uniformizing variable $X_m$, the $J_m$ have Fourier expansions $J_m = 1/X_m + \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} A_n(m) X_m^n$, where the $A_n(x)$ are polynomials in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$. The present article is concerned with models $\mathcal{A}_n[p](x)$ of the $A_n(x)$: polynomials representing self-maps of finite fields with characteristic $p$. The main content is a conjecture specifying $\mathcal{A}_n[p](x)$ up to a multiplicative constant for certain families of $n$ and $p$, based on numerical experiments.

Finite field models of Raleigh-Akiyama polynomials for Hecke groups

Abstract

Following work of Raleigh and Akiyama (\cite{raleigh1962fourier, akiyama1992note}), in \cite{interpolating} we considered (among other objects) families of weight zero meromorphic modular forms for Hecke groups . We conjectured in \cite{interpolating} that, for a certain uniformizing variable , the have Fourier expansions , where the are polynomials in . The present article is concerned with models of the : polynomials representing self-maps of finite fields with characteristic . The main content is a conjecture specifying up to a multiplicative constant for certain families of and , based on numerical experiments.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 2 theorems, 15 equations)

This paper contains 11 sections, 2 theorems, 15 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $\mathcal{K} = \{J_3, , J_4,...\}$ and $\overline{\mathcal{K}} = \{j_3, j_4,....\}$ Then there exist polynomials $Q_{\mathcal{K},k,n}(x)$ and $Q_{\overline{\mathcal{K}},k,n}(x)$ in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that and In other words, $A_{\mathcal{K},k,m}(n) = Q_{\mathcal{K},k,n}(m)$ and $A_{\overline{\mathcal{K}},k,m}(n) = Q_{\overline{\mathcal{K}},k,n}(m)$ for $k = 1, 2, ..., m = 3, 4, ...$, and $

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4
  • Remark 1
  • Definition 5
  • Definition 6
  • Definition 7
  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • ...and 9 more