Cluster Algebras: Network Science and Machine Learning
Pierre-Philippe Dechant, Yang-Hui He, Elli Heyes, Edward Hirst
TL;DR
This work applies network science and supervised learning to cluster algebras, revealing a robust symmetry in quiver embeddings when permutation equivalence is not imposed and uncovering integer seed-to-quiver ratios for finite Dynkin types. By analyzing seed and quiver exchange graphs up to depth 4 across finite, finite-mutation, and infinite types, the authors show distinct network-analytic signatures and identify a strong, intrusion-resistant signal for classification using simple neural networks, achieving accuracies above 0.9. They also demonstrate that seed data alone carry substantial discriminative power, and that generalised associahedra embedding explains part of the observed structure, with concrete integer ratios between seeds and quivers conjectured to hold at higher ranks. The results provide a data-driven lens on cluster algebra structure with potential implications for automating classification, exploring embeddings, and guiding future algebraic investigations, while offering publicly available code and datasets for reproducibility.
Abstract
Cluster algebras have recently become an important player in mathematics and physics. In this work, we investigate them through the lens of modern data science, specifically with techniques from network science and machine learning. Network analysis methods are applied to the exchange graphs for cluster algebras of varying mutation types. The analysis indicates that when the graphs are represented without identifying by permutation equivalence between clusters an elegant symmetry emerges in the quiver exchange graph embedding. The ratio between number of seeds and number of quivers associated to this symmetry is computed for finite Dynkin type algebras up to rank 5, and conjectured for higher ranks. Simple machine learning techniques successfully learn to classify cluster algebras using the data of seeds. The learning performance exceeds 0.9 accuracies between algebras of the same mutation type and between types, as well as relative to artificially generated data.
